Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Clinical Outcomes of Patients with Diabetes Who Exhibit Upper-Quartile Insulin Antibody Responses After Treatment with LY2963016 or Lantus® Insulin Glargine.
Ilag, Liza L; Costigan, Timothy M; Deeg, Mark A; Pollom, Robyn K; Chang, Curtis L; Konrad, Robert J; Prince, Melvin J.
Afiliação
  • Ilag LL; Lilly Corporate Center, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, 46285, USA. ilag_liza_l@lilly.com.
  • Costigan TM; Lilly Corporate Center, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, 46285, USA.
  • Deeg MA; Lilly Corporate Center, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, 46285, USA.
  • Pollom RK; Lilly Corporate Center, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, 46285, USA.
  • Chang CL; Lilly Corporate Center, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, 46285, USA.
  • Konrad RJ; Ditmanson Medical Foundation Chiayi Christian Hospital, 539 Jhongsiao Road, Chiayi, Taiwan.
  • Prince MJ; Lilly Corporate Center, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, 46285, USA.
Diabetes Ther ; 8(3): 545-554, 2017 Jun.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28361463
INTRODUCTION: We compared insulin antibody response (IAR) profiles in patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) or type 2 diabetes (T2D) who received LY2963016 insulin glargine (LY IGlar) or Lantus® insulin glargine (IGlar) and evaluated the potential relationship between higher IARs and clinical and safety outcomes with a focus on patients who exhibited antibody responses in the upper quartile. METHODS: Data from ELEMENT-1 (52-week open-label in T1D) and ELEMENT-2 (24-week, double-blind study in T2D) were analyzed. Maximum postbaseline IAR levels and proportions of patients in the upper quartile of maximum antibody percent binding (UQMAPB; patients with maximum postbaseline percent binding in the highest 25% of maximum values observed) were compared for differential treatment effects on clinical efficacy outcomes and incidence of adverse events. Continuous outcomes were analyzed by analysis of covariance. Categorical data were analyzed by the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel or Breslow-Day test. RESULTS: In both studies (N = 532 evaluable patients with T1D; N = 730 with T2D), no statistically significant differences between LY IGlar and IGlar were observed for maximum antibody percent binding (MAPB) levels or for proportions of patients in the respective UQMAPB. No statistically significant differential treatment effects were observed in the relationship between MAPB and clinical efficacy and safety outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Maximum postbaseline IAR levels and the proportion of patients with high IAR levels were similar for LY IGlar and IGlar. High antibody levels did not affect clinical outcomes. These results add further evidence supporting similar IARs of LY IGlar and IGlar. FUNDING: Eli Lilly and Company and Boehringer-Ingelheim.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article