Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Heart rate recovery improvement in patients following acute myocardial infarction: exercise training, ß-blocker therapy or both.
Medeiros, Wladimir M; de Luca, Fabio A; de Figueredo Júnior, Alcides R; Mendes, Felipe A R; Gun, Carlos.
Afiliação
  • Medeiros WM; Laboratory of Exercise Physiology and Cardiac Rehabilitation (GERFE), Department of Medicine and Physiotherapy, Santo Amaro University (UNISA), São Paulo, Brazil.
  • de Luca FA; Pulmonary Function and Clinical Exercise Physiology Unit (SEFICE), Respiratory Division, Department of Medicine, Federal University of São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo, Brazil.
  • de Figueredo Júnior AR; Department of Rehabilitation and Functional Capacity, School of Physiotherapy, Ibirapuera University (UNIB), São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Mendes FAR; Laboratory of Exercise Physiology and Cardiac Rehabilitation (GERFE), Department of Medicine and Physiotherapy, Santo Amaro University (UNISA), São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Gun C; Pulmonary Function and Clinical Exercise Physiology Unit (SEFICE), Respiratory Division, Department of Medicine, Federal University of São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo, Brazil.
Clin Physiol Funct Imaging ; 38(3): 351-359, 2018 May.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28402023
ABSTRACT
Heart rate recovery (HRR) is a strong mortality predictor. Exercise training (ET) and ß-blocker therapy have significant impact on the HRR of patients following myocardial infarction (MI). However, the combination of ET and ß-blocker therapy, as well as its effectiveness in patients with a more compromised HRR (≤12 bpm), has been under-studied. Male patients (n = 64) post-MI were divided Training + ß-blocker (n = 19), Training (n = 15), ß-blocker (n = 11) and Control (n = 19). Participants performed an ergometric test before and after 3 months of intervention. HRR was obtained during 5 min of recovery and corrected by the cardiac reserve (HRRcorrCR ). Compared to pre-intervention, HRRcorrCR was significantly increased during the 1st and 2nd minutes of recovery in the Training + ß-blocker group (70·5% and 37·5%, respectively; P<0·05). A significant improvement, lasting from the 1st to the 4th minute of recovery, was also observed in the Training group (47%, 50%, 25% and 8·7%, respectively; P<0·05). In contrast, the ß-blocker group showed a reduction in HRRcorrCR during the 2nd and 3rd minutes of recovery (-21·2% and -16·3%, respectively; P<0·05). In addition, interventions involving ET (Training + ßb, Training) were significantly more effective in patients with a pre-intervention HRR ≤ 12 bpm than for patients with HRR > 12 bpm. Combination of ß-blocker therapy with ET does not compromise the effect of training and instead promotes HRR and aerobic capacity improvement. In addition, this combination is particularly beneficial for individuals presenting with a more compromised HRR. However, chronic administration of ß-blocker therapy alone did not promote improvement in HRR or aerobic capacity.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Tolerância ao Exercício / Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta / Terapia por Exercício / Infarto do Miocárdio com Supradesnível do Segmento ST / Reabilitação Cardíaca / Frequência Cardíaca Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Tolerância ao Exercício / Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta / Terapia por Exercício / Infarto do Miocárdio com Supradesnível do Segmento ST / Reabilitação Cardíaca / Frequência Cardíaca Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article