Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluation of perceived and actual competency in a family medicine objective structured clinical examination.
Graves, Lisa; Lalla, Leonora; Young, Meredith.
Afiliação
  • Graves L; Professor in the Department of Family and Community Medicine in the Homer Stryker MD School of Medicine at Western Michigan University in Kalamazoo. lisa.graves@med.wmich.edu.
  • Lalla L; Assistant Professor and Director of Undergraduate Education in the Department of Family Medicine at McGill University in Montreal, Que.
  • Young M; Assistant Professor in the Department of Medicine and Research Scientist in the Centre for Medical Education at McGill University.
Can Fam Physician ; 63(4): e238-e243, 2017 Apr.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28404722
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To examine the relationship between objective assessment of performance and self-rated competence immediately before and after participation in a required summative family medicine clerkship objective structured clinical examination (OSCE).

DESIGN:

Learners rated their competence (on a 7-point Likert scale) before and after an OSCE along 3 dimensions general, specific, and professional competencies relevant to family medicine.

SETTING:

McGill University in Montreal, Que.

PARTICIPANTS:

All 168 third-year clinical clerks completing their mandatory family medicine rotation in 2010 to 2011 were invited to participate. MAIN OUTCOME

MEASURES:

Self-ratings of competence and objective performance scores were compared, and were examined to determine if OSCEs could be a "corrective" tool for self-rating perceived competence (ie, if the experience of undergoing an assessment might assist learners in recalibrating their understanding of their own performance).

RESULTS:

A total of 140 (83%) of the third-year clinical clerks participated. Participating in an OSCE decreased learners' ratings of perceived competence (pre-OSCE score = 4.9, post-OSCE score = 4.7; F1,3192 = 4.2; P < .05). Learners' mean self-rated competence for all categories of behaviour (before and after) showed no relationship to OSCE performance (r < 0.12 and P > .08 for all), nor did ratings of station-relevant competence (before and after) (r < 0.19 and P > .09 for all). Ratings of competence before and after the OSCE were correlated for individual students (r > 0.40 and P < .001 for all).

CONCLUSION:

After the OSCE, students' self-ratings of perceived competence had decreased, and these ratings had little relationship to actual performance, regardless of the specificity of the rated competency. Discordance between perceived and actual competence is neither novel nor unique to family medicine. However, this discordance is an important consideration for the development of competency-based curricula.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Autoavaliação (Psicologia) / Estágio Clínico / Competência Clínica / Avaliação Educacional / Medicina de Família e Comunidade Tipo de estudo: Evaluation_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans País como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Autoavaliação (Psicologia) / Estágio Clínico / Competência Clínica / Avaliação Educacional / Medicina de Família e Comunidade Tipo de estudo: Evaluation_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans País como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article