Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The impact of atosiban on pregnancy outcomes in women undergoing in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer: A meta-analysis.
Huang, Qian-Yi; Rong, Min-Hua; Lan, Ai-Hua; Lin, Xiao-Miao; Lin, Xing-Gu; He, Rong-Quan; Chen, Gang; Li, Mu-Jun.
Afiliação
  • Huang QY; Department of Reproductive Medical Research Center, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China.
  • Rong MH; Research Department, Affiliated Cancer Hospital, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China.
  • Lan AH; Department of Reproductive Medical Research Center, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China.
  • Lin XM; Department of Children Rehabilitation Medicine, Guangxi Matemal and Child Health Hospital, Nanning, China.
  • Lin XG; Center of Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China.
  • He RQ; Center of Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China.
  • Chen G; Department of Pathology, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China.
  • Li MJ; Department of Reproductive Medical Research Center, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China.
PLoS One ; 12(4): e0175501, 2017.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28422984
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Atosiban is administered to women undergoing in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET) to improve pregnancy outcomes. However, the results of this treatment were controversial. We conducted this meta-analysis to investigate whether atosiban improves pregnancy outcomes in the women undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF).

METHODS:

Databases of PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, China BioMedicine, and Google Scholar were systematically searched. Meta-analyses were performed to investigate whether atosiban improves pregnancy outcomes in the women undergoing IVF.

RESULTS:

Our results showed that atosiban was associated with higher implantation (OR = 1.63, 95% CI 1.17-2.27; P = 0.004) and clinical pregnancy (OR = 1.84, 95% CI 1.31-2.57; P < 0.001) rates. However, atosiban showed no significant association with the miscarriage, live birth, multiple pregnancy or ectopic pregnancy rates. When a further subgroup analysis was performed in the women undergoing repeated implantation failure (RIF), implantation (OR = 1.93, 95% CI 1.45-2.57; P < 0.001), clinical pregnancy (OR = 2.48, 95% CI 1.70-3.64; P <0.001) and the live birth (OR = 2.89, 95% CI 1.78-4.67; P < 0.001) rates were significantly higher in the case group. Nevertheless, no significant difference was detected in the miscarriage and multiple pregnancy rates between the case and control groups.

CONCLUSION:

Atosiban may be more appropriate for women undergoing RIF and play only a limited role in improving pregnancy outcomes in the general population of women undergoing IVF. These conclusions should be verified in large and well-designed studies.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Vasotocina / Fertilização in vitro / Taxa de Gravidez / Transferência Embrionária / Antagonistas de Hormônios Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Vasotocina / Fertilização in vitro / Taxa de Gravidez / Transferência Embrionária / Antagonistas de Hormônios Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article