Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Serum free light chain quantitative assays: Dilemma of a biomarker.
Cigliana, Giovanni; Gulli, Francesca; Napodano, Cecilia; Pocino, Krizia; De Santis, Elena; Colacicco, Luigi; Cordone, Iole; Conti, Laura; Basile, Umberto.
Afiliação
  • Cigliana G; Laboratory of Clinical Pathology, National Cancer Institute "Regina Elena", Rome, Italy.
  • Gulli F; Department of Laboratory Medicine, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy.
  • Napodano C; Department of Laboratory Medicine, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy.
  • Pocino K; Department of Laboratory Medicine, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy.
  • De Santis E; Laboratory of Clinical Pathology, National Cancer Institute "Regina Elena", Rome, Italy.
  • Colacicco L; Department of Laboratory Medicine, Institute of Biochemistry, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy.
  • Cordone I; Oncoematology, Clinical Pathology, National Cancer Institute "Regina Elena", Rome, Italy.
  • Conti L; Laboratory of Clinical Pathology, National Cancer Institute "Regina Elena", Rome, Italy.
  • Basile U; Department of Laboratory Medicine, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy.
J Clin Lab Anal ; 32(2)2018 Feb.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28444965
BACKGROUND: Serum free light chains detection assays are consistently meeting greater interest for the diagnosis and monitoring of monoclonal gammopathies and plasma cell dyscrasias. Nowadays, there are neither standardized methods nor reference material for the determination of free light chains; for this reason, it is important to compare two different assays used in clinical laboratory. METHODS: We evaluated 300 serum samples from patients with B-cell disorders and compared the analytical performances of both assay. Each test was assayed on both testing platforms (Siemens Dade Behring BN II Nephelometer and SPAPLUS by The Binding Site). κ/λ ratios were determined and compared. Results were analyzed by Passing-Bablok and Bland-Altman plots to evaluate comparability of the two techniques and to determine bias. RESULTS: The reproducibility of both assays is acceptable, reaching minimum and desirable analytical goals derived from biological variability. However, values are not interchangeable between systems. This study shows that the two systems do not allow results to be transferred from one method to the other even if they display good agreement. CONCLUSION: Our study highlights the importance of elaborating an international standard for free light chains quantification in order to offer homogeneous results as well as guarantee harmonization of values among laboratories. Moreover, the assays should be validated in specific patient groups to determine that they are clinically fit for purpose.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Biomarcadores / Biomarcadores Tumorais / Cadeias Leves de Imunoglobulina Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Biomarcadores / Biomarcadores Tumorais / Cadeias Leves de Imunoglobulina Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article