Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Is vaginal breech delivery associated with higher risk for perinatal death and cerebral palsy compared with vaginal cephalic birth? Registry-based cohort study in Norway.
Bjellmo, Solveig; Andersen, Guro L; Martinussen, Marit Petra; Romundstad, Pål Richard; Hjelle, Sissel; Moster, Dag; Vik, Torstein.
Afiliação
  • Bjellmo S; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Helse More og Romsdal HF, Alesund, Norway.
  • Andersen GL; The Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NTNU, Trondheim, Norway.
  • Martinussen MP; The Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NTNU, Trondheim, Norway.
  • Romundstad PR; The Cerebral Palsy Registry of Norway, Habilitation Center, Vestfold Hospital, Tønsberg, Norway.
  • Hjelle S; The Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NTNU, Trondheim, Norway.
  • Moster D; Department of Laboratory Medicine, Children's and Women's Health, LBK, Trondheim, Norway.
  • Vik T; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, St Olav`s Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.
BMJ Open ; 7(4): e014979, 2017 05 04.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28473516
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

This paper aims to study if vaginal breech delivery is associated with increased risk for neonatal mortality (NNM) or cerebral palsy (CP) in Norway where vaginal delivery accounts for 1/3 of all breech deliveries.

DESIGN:

Cohort study using information from the national Medical BirthRegister and Cerebral Palsy Register.

SETTING:

Births in Norway 1999-2009.

PARTICIPANTS:

520 047 term-born singletons without congenital malformations. MAIN OUTCOME

MEASURES:

NNM, CP and a composite outcome of these and death during birth.

RESULTS:

Compared with cephalic births, breech births had substantially increased risk for NNM but not for CP. Vaginal delivery was planned for 7917 of 16 700 fetuses in breech, while 5561 actually delivered vaginally. Among these, NNM was 0.9 per 1000 compared with 0.3 per 1000 in vaginal cephalic delivery, and 0.8 per 1000 in those actually born by caesarean delivery (CD) in breech. Compared with planned cephalic delivery, planned vaginal delivery was associated with excess risk for NNM (OR 2.4; 95% CI 1.2 to 4.9), while the OR associated with planned breech CD was 1.6 (95% CI 0.7 to 3.7). These risks were attenuated when NNM was substituted by the composite outcome. Vaginal breech delivery was not associated with excess risk for CP compared with vaginal cephalic delivery.

CONCLUSION:

Vaginal breech delivery, regardless of whether planned or actual, and actual breech CD were associated with excess risk for NNM compared with vaginal cephalic delivery, but not with CP. The risk for NNM and CP in planned breech CD did not differ significantly from planned vaginal cephalic delivery. However, the absolute risk for these outcomes was low, and taking into consideration potential long-term adverse consequences of CD for the child and later deliveries, we therefore conclude that vaginal breech delivery may be recommended, provided competent obstetric care and strict criteria for selection to vaginal delivery.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Apresentação Pélvica / Paralisia Cerebral / Parto Obstétrico / Morte Perinatal Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Infant / Male / Newborn / Pregnancy País como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Apresentação Pélvica / Paralisia Cerebral / Parto Obstétrico / Morte Perinatal Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Infant / Male / Newborn / Pregnancy País como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article