Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The role of neo-sinus reconstruction in aortic valve-sparing surgery.
Gaudino, Mario; Di Franco, Antonino; Weltert, Luca; Benedetto, Umberto; Lau, Christopher; Gambardella, Ivancarmine; De Paulis, Ruggero; Girardi, Leonard N.
Afiliação
  • Gaudino M; Department of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, Weill-Cornell Medical Center, New York City, New York.
  • Di Franco A; Department of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, Weill-Cornell Medical Center, New York City, New York.
  • Weltert L; Department of Cardiac Surgery, European Hospital, Rome, Italy.
  • Benedetto U; Bristol Heart Institute, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
  • Lau C; Department of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, Weill-Cornell Medical Center, New York City, New York.
  • Gambardella I; Department of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, Weill-Cornell Medical Center, New York City, New York.
  • De Paulis R; Department of Cardiac Surgery, European Hospital, Rome, Italy.
  • Girardi LN; Department of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, Weill-Cornell Medical Center, New York City, New York.
J Card Surg ; 32(6): 328-333, 2017 Jun.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28485110
ABSTRACT

AIMS:

The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and echocardiographic results and the predictors of outcomes in patients undergoing valve-sparing operation (VSO) at two aortic centers. In addition, we sought to evaluate the potential effect of recreation of the sinuses of Valsalva (SV) on the outcome of valve-sparing procedures.

METHODS:

During a 14-year period, 328 patients underwent aortic valve-sparing root replacement at two institutions. Clinical and echo evaluation was performed 6 months after surgery and every year thereafter or in case of clinical symptoms. Propensity weighting and propensity-weighted risk competing analysis were used.

RESULTS:

No operative mortality was reported; the most common complication was revision for bleeding, occurring in 15 patients (4.6%). At a mean follow-up of 30.0 ± 33.9 months, two patients died (0.6%). Recurrent aortic insufficiency (AI) >2+ was found in 11 patients (3.3%); five (1.5%) underwent reoperation. Recreation of the SV did not affect clinical outcome and aortic valve status. Need for aortic valve repair was the only independent predictor of recurrent AI, whereas a bicuspid aortic valve was a protective factor.

CONCLUSIONS:

Re-creation of the SV does not affect short-term outcomes following VSO.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Aorta / Valva Aórtica / Insuficiência da Valva Aórtica / Seio Aórtico / Implante de Prótese Vascular / Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica / Tratamentos com Preservação do Órgão Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Aorta / Valva Aórtica / Insuficiência da Valva Aórtica / Seio Aórtico / Implante de Prótese Vascular / Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica / Tratamentos com Preservação do Órgão Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article