Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Diagnostic Performance of C-Reactive Protein in Detecting Post-Operative Infectious Complications After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy.
Dib, Fadia; Parenti, Lara Ribeiro; Boutten, Anne; Hajage, David; Marmuse, Jean-Pierre.
Afiliação
  • Dib F; AP-HP, Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Clinical Research, Bichat-Claude-Bernard Hospital, Paris Diderot University, 46, rue Henri-Huchard, 75018, Paris, France. fadia.dib@aphp.fr.
  • Parenti LR; INSERM, CIC-EC 1425, 75018, Paris, France. fadia.dib@aphp.fr.
  • Boutten A; AP-HP, General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Bichat-Claude-Bernard Hospital, Paris, France.
  • Hajage D; AP-HP, Department of Biochemistry, Bichat-Claude-Bernard Hospital, Paris, France.
  • Marmuse JP; Département de Biostatistiques, Santé publique et Information médicale, AP-HP, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, 75013, Paris, France.
Obes Surg ; 27(12): 3124-3132, 2017 12.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28593482
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Gastric leak is the most common and dreaded post-operative infectious complication (PIC) after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). Accurate identification of patients at risk postoperatively is of cardinal importance.

OBJECTIVE:

The aim of this study is to assess the diagnostic performance of C-reactive protein (CRP) in predicting PICs and the most optimal time to measure it.

METHODS:

CRP results were collected in patients undergoing LSG between 2011 and 2015. CRP was systematically measured on post-operative days (POD) 1, 3, and 5.

RESULTS:

Of 1326 patients, 42 (3.2%) developed a PIC at a median of 5 days after surgery. The incidence of leakage was 1.9%. The best area under the curve was observed on POD5 (0.87; 95% CI 0.77-0.96). At this time point, a cut-off of 115 mg/L yielded a sensitivity of 66.7% (95% CI 46.5-86.8%), a specificity of 95.1% (95% CI 93.9-96.3%), a positive and negative predictive values of 19.4% (95% CI 10.3-28.6%) and 99.4% (95% CI 99.0-100%), respectively, and a positive and negative likelihood ratios (LRs) of 13.62 and 0.35, respectively. The combination of sequential assessments of CRP on POD3 and 5 provided a sensitivity of 84.4% (95% CI 71.8-97.0%), a specificity of 91.1% (95% CI 89.5-92.8%), a positive and negative predictive values of 20.9% (95% CI 14.0-27.9%) and 99.5% (95% CI 99.1-99.9%), respectively, and a positive and a negative LRs of 9.58 and 0.17, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS:

CRP may be useful to identify patients at risk of PICs after LSG and, therefore, to prompt early investigation. However, CRP does not help rule out PICs.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Complicações Pós-Operatórias / Obesidade Mórbida / Proteína C-Reativa / Biomarcadores / Gastrectomia / Infecções Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Complicações Pós-Operatórias / Obesidade Mórbida / Proteína C-Reativa / Biomarcadores / Gastrectomia / Infecções Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article