Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Impact of Bilateral Prophylactic Mastectomy and Immediate Reconstruction on Health-Related Quality of Life in Women at High Risk for Breast Carcinoma: Results of the Mastectomy Reconstruction Outcomes Consortium Study.
McCarthy, Colleen M; Hamill, Jennifer B; Kim, Hyungjin Myra; Qi, Ji; Wilkins, Edwin; Pusic, Andrea L.
Afiliação
  • McCarthy CM; Plastic and Reconstructive Surgical Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. mccarthc@mskcc.org.
  • Hamill JB; Section of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
  • Kim HM; Center for Statistical Consultation and Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
  • Qi J; Section of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
  • Wilkins E; Section of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
  • Pusic AL; Plastic and Reconstructive Surgical Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 24(9): 2502-2508, 2017 Sep.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28612125
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Although bilateral prophylactic mastectomy (BPM) can reduce the risk of breast cancer, the decision to proceed surgically can have significant consequences and requires careful deliberation. To facilitate decision making for women at high risk for breast carcinoma, the risks and benefits of BPM should be well-elucidated. We sought to determine the effects of BPM and immediate reconstruction on health-related quality-of-life outcomes among a multisite cohort of women at high risk for breast carcinoma.

METHODS:

Patient-reported outcome data were prospectively collected as part of the Mastectomy Reconstruction Outcomes Consortium Study, and data on a subgroup of 204 high-risk women who elected to have BPM and immediate reconstruction were evaluated. Baseline scores were compared with scores at 1 or 2 years after reconstruction.

RESULTS:

Satisfaction with breasts and psychosocial well-being were significantly higher at both 1 and 2 years (p < 0.01); however, anxiety was significantly lower at 1 or 2 years (p < 0.01) and physical well-being of the chest and upper body was significantly worse at 1 year (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION:

Our results highlight the impact of BPM and immediate reconstruction on health-related quality-of-life outcomes in this setting. BPM and reconstruction can result in significant, positive, lasting changes in a woman's satisfaction with her breasts, as well as her psychosocial well-being. Furthermore, presurgery anxiety was significantly reduced by 1 year post-reconstruction and remained reduced at 2 years. With this knowledge, women at high risk for breast carcinoma, and their providers, will be better equipped to make the best individualized treatment decisions.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Qualidade de Vida / Neoplasias da Mama / Carcinoma / Mamoplastia / Mastectomia Profilática Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Qualidade de Vida / Neoplasias da Mama / Carcinoma / Mamoplastia / Mastectomia Profilática Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article