Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Reliability of updated left ventricular diastolic function recommendations in predicting elevated left ventricular filling pressure and prognosis.
Sato, Kimi; Grant, Andrew D M; Negishi, Kazuaki; Cremer, Paul C; Negishi, Tomoko; Kumar, Arnav; Collier, Patrick; Kapadia, Samir R; Grimm, Richard A; Desai, Milind Y; Griffin, Brian P; Popovic, Zoran B.
Afiliação
  • Sato K; Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.
  • Grant ADM; Libin Cardiovascular Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
  • Negishi K; Menzies Research Institute, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia.
  • Cremer PC; Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.
  • Negishi T; Menzies Research Institute, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia.
  • Kumar A; Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.
  • Collier P; Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.
  • Kapadia SR; Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.
  • Grimm RA; Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.
  • Desai MY; Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.
  • Griffin BP; Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.
  • Popovic ZB; Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH. Electronic address: popoviz@ccf.org.
Am Heart J ; 189: 28-39, 2017 Jul.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28625379
ABSTRACT
An updated 2016 echocardiographic algorithm for diagnosing left ventricular (LV) diastolic dysfunction (DD) was recently proposed. We aimed to assess the reliability of the 2016 echocardiographic LVDD grading algorithm in predicting elevated LV filling pressure and clinical outcomes compared to the 2009 version.

METHODS:

We retrospectively identified 460 consecutive patients without atrial fibrillation or significant mitral valve disease who underwent transthoracic echocardiography within 24 hours of elective heart catheterization. LV end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) and the time constant of isovolumic pressure decay (Tau) were determined. The association between DD grading by 2009 LVDD Recommendations and 2016 Recommendations with hemodynamic parameters and all-cause mortality were compared.

RESULTS:

The 2009 LVDD Recommendations classified 55 patients (12%) as having normal, 132 (29%) as grade 1, 156 (34%) as grade 2, and 117 (25%) as grade 3 DD. Based on 2016 Recommendations, 177 patients (38%) were normal, 50 (11%) were indeterminate, 124 (27%) patients were grade 1, 75 (16%) were grade 2, 26 (6%) were grade 3 DD, and 8 (2%) were cannot determine. The 2016 Recommendations had superior discriminatory accuracy in predicting LVEDP (P<.001) but were not superior in predicting Tau. During median follow-up of 416 days (interquartile range 5 to 2004 days), 54 patients (12%) died. Significant DD by 2016 Recommendations was associated with higher risk of mortality (P=.039, subdistribution HR1.85 [95% CI, 1.03-3.33]) in multivariable competing risk regression.

CONCLUSIONS:

The grading algorithm proposed by the 2016 LV diastolic dysfunction Recommendations detects elevated LVEDP and poor prognosis better than the 2009 Recommendations.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Volume Sistólico / Ecocardiografia / Função Ventricular Esquerda / Pressão Ventricular / Disfunção Ventricular Esquerda Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Volume Sistólico / Ecocardiografia / Função Ventricular Esquerda / Pressão Ventricular / Disfunção Ventricular Esquerda Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article