Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
E-learning in graduate medical education: survey of residency program directors.
Wittich, Christopher M; Agrawal, Anoop; Cook, David A; Halvorsen, Andrew J; Mandrekar, Jayawant N; Chaudhry, Saima; Dupras, Denise M; Oxentenko, Amy S; Beckman, Thomas J.
Afiliação
  • Wittich CM; Division of General Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. wittich.christopher@mayo.edu.
  • Agrawal A; Departments of Medicine and Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Cook DA; Division of General Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
  • Halvorsen AJ; Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
  • Mandrekar JN; Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
  • Chaudhry S; Department of Medicine, Memorial Healthcare System, Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA.
  • Dupras DM; Division of Primary Care Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
  • Oxentenko AS; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
  • Beckman TJ; Division of General Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
BMC Med Educ ; 17(1): 114, 2017 Jul 11.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28697744
BACKGROUND: E-learning-the use of Internet technologies to enhance knowledge and performance-has become a widely accepted instructional approach. Little is known about the current use of e-learning in postgraduate medical education. To determine utilization of e-learning by United States internal medicine residency programs, program director (PD) perceptions of e-learning, and associations between e-learning use and residency program characteristics. METHODS: We conducted a national survey in collaboration with the Association of Program Directors in Internal Medicine of all United States internal medicine residency programs. RESULTS: Of the 368 PDs, 214 (58.2%) completed the e-learning survey. Use of synchronous e-learning at least sometimes, somewhat often, or very often was reported by 85 (39.7%); 153 programs (71.5%) use asynchronous e-learning at least sometimes, somewhat often, or very often. Most programs (168; 79%) do not have a budget to integrate e-learning. Mean (SD) scores for the PD perceptions of e-learning ranged from 3.01 (0.94) to 3.86 (0.72) on a 5-point scale. The odds of synchronous e-learning use were higher in programs with a budget for its implementation (odds ratio, 3.0 [95% CI, 1.04-8.7]; P = .04). CONCLUSIONS: Residency programs could be better resourced to integrate e-learning technologies. Asynchronous e-learning was used more than synchronous, which may be to accommodate busy resident schedules and duty-hour restrictions. PD perceptions of e-learning are relatively moderate and future research should determine whether PD reluctance to adopt e-learning is based on unawareness of the evidence, perceptions that e-learning is expensive, or judgments about value versus effectiveness.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Instrução por Computador / Currículo / Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina / Internato e Residência Tipo de estudo: Evaluation_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Instrução por Computador / Currículo / Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina / Internato e Residência Tipo de estudo: Evaluation_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article