Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Management approach for recurrent brain metastases following upfront radiosurgery may affect risk of subsequent radiation necrosis.
Rae, Ali; Gorovets, Daniel; Rava, Paul; Ebner, Daniel; Cielo, Deus; Kinsella, Timothy J; DiPetrillo, Thomas A; Hepel, Jaroslaw T.
Afiliação
  • Rae A; Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI.
  • Gorovets D; Department of Radiation Oncology, Rhode Island Hospital, Brown University, Providence, RI.
  • Rava P; Department of Radiation Oncology, Tufts Medical Center, Tufts University, Boston, MA.
  • Ebner D; Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Cancer Center, University of Massachusetts, Worcester, MA.
  • Cielo D; Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI.
  • Kinsella TJ; Department of Neurosurgery, Rhode Island Hospital, Brown University, Providence, RI.
  • DiPetrillo TA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Rhode Island Hospital, Brown University, Providence, RI.
  • Hepel JT; Department of Radiation Oncology, Tufts Medical Center, Tufts University, Boston, MA.
Adv Radiat Oncol ; 1(4): 294-299, 2016.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28740900
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Many patients treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) alone as initial treatment require 1 or more subsequent salvage therapies. This study aimed to determine if commonly used salvage strategies are associated with differing risks of radiation necrosis (RN). METHODS AND MATERIALS All patients treated with upfront SRS alone for brain metastases at our institution were retrospectively analyzed. Salvage treatment details were obtained for brain failures. Patients who underwent repeat SRS to the same lesion were excluded. RN was determined based on pathological confirmation or advanced brain imaging consistent with RN in a symptomatic patient. Patients were grouped according to salvage treatment and rates of RN were compared via Fisher's exact tests.

RESULTS:

Of 284 patients treated with upfront SRS alone, 132 received salvage therapy and 44 received multiple salvage treatments. This included 31 repeat SRS alone, 58 whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) alone, 28 SRS and WBRT, 7 surgery alone, and 8 surgery with adjuvant radiation. With a median follow-up of 10 months, the rate of RN among all patients was 3.17% (9/284), salvaged patients 4.55% (6/132), and never salvaged patients 1.97% (3/152). Receiving salvage therapy did not significantly increase RN risk (P = .31). Of the patients requiring salvage treatments, the highest RN rate was among patients that had both salvage SRS and WBRT (delivered as separate salvage therapies) (6/28, 21.42%). RN rate in this group was significantly higher than in those treated with repeat SRS alone (0/31), WBRT alone (0/58), surgery alone (0/7), and surgery with adjuvant radiation (0/8). Comparing salvage WBRT doses <30 Gy versus ≥30 Gy revealed no effect of dose on RN rate. Additionally, among patients who received multiple SRS treatments, number of treated lesions was not predictive of RN incidence.

CONCLUSION:

Our results suggest that initial management approach for recurrent brain metastasis after upfront SRS does not affect the rate of RN. However, the risk of RN significantly increases when patients are treated with both repeat SRS and salvage WBRT. Methods to improve prediction of toxicity and optimize patient selection for salvage treatments are needed.

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article