Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Utility of high density multielectrode mapping during ablation of scar-related ventricular tachycardia.
Cano, Óscar; Plaza, Diego; Saurí, Assumpció; Osca, Joaquín; Alonso, Pau; Andrés, Ana; Sancho-Tello, María-José; Martínez-Dolz, Luis.
Afiliação
  • Cano Ó; Electrophysiology Section, Cardiology Department, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Valencia, Spain.
  • Plaza D; Electrophysiology Section, Cardiology Department, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Valencia, Spain.
  • Saurí A; Electrophysiology Section, Cardiology Department, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Valencia, Spain.
  • Osca J; Electrophysiology Section, Cardiology Department, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Valencia, Spain.
  • Alonso P; Electrophysiology Section, Cardiology Department, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Valencia, Spain.
  • Andrés A; Electrophysiology Section, Cardiology Department, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Valencia, Spain.
  • Sancho-Tello MJ; Electrophysiology Section, Cardiology Department, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Valencia, Spain.
  • Martínez-Dolz L; Electrophysiology Section, Cardiology Department, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Valencia, Spain.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol ; 28(11): 1306-1315, 2017 Nov.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28744991
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Multielectrode mapping catheters (MEMC) allow the performance of high resolution and density maps but the utility of these catheters in ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation procedures has not been yet widely described. We sought to evaluate the utility of a MEMC during scar-related VT ablation procedures.

METHODS:

Eighty-five consecutive scar-related VT ablation procedures were performed in 81 patients. In the first 26 procedures, a standard 3.5-mm tip linear catheter was employed for endocardial/epicardial mapping (control group). In the following 59 procedures mapping was performed with a MEMC (study group). Procedural time, LV endocardial and epicardial mapping time, complications and ablation outcomes were compared.

RESULTS:

The use of the MEMC resulted in a significant shortening of the endocardial and epicardial mapping times (38 ± 15 minutes vs. 56 ± 24 minutes for endocardial LV mapping in the study and control group, respectively, P = 0.001; and 28 ± 9 minutes vs 41 ± 16 minutes, for epicardial mapping, P = 0.011) as well as the total procedural time (177 ± 53 minutes vs. 206 ± 50 minutes, respectively, P = 0.02). The mapping density was also significantly increased in the study group (mean endocardial LV points 2,143 ± 1,419 vs. 485 ± 174, for the study and control group, respectively, P < 0.0001), specially within the scar area (49.6 ± 34 points/cm2 vs. 8.4 ± 4.6 points/cm2 , P < 0.001). No differences in acute and long-term follow-up outcomes were observed.

CONCLUSIONS:

High-density multielectrode mapping is associated with a significant reduction of procedural and mapping times and a significant increase of mapping density without affecting outcomes in patients with scar-related VT.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Cicatriz / Taquicardia Ventricular / Mapeamento Epicárdico Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Cicatriz / Taquicardia Ventricular / Mapeamento Epicárdico Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article