Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Attitudes and barriers to the use of donation after cardiac death livers: Comparison of a United States transplant center survey to the united network for organ sharing data.
Sher, Linda; Quintini, Cristiano; Fayek, Sameh Adel; Abt, Peter; Lo, Mary; Yuk, Pui; Ji, Lingyun; Groshen, Susan; Case, Jamie; Marsh, Christopher Lee.
Afiliação
  • Sher L; Departments of Surgery, Los Angeles, CA.
  • Quintini C; Liver Transplantation and HPB Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH.
  • Fayek SA; Transplant Surgery, Medical City Transplant Institute-Fort Worth, Fort Worth, TX.
  • Abt P; Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
  • Lo M; Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine of University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA.
  • Yuk P; Departments of Surgery, Los Angeles, CA.
  • Ji L; Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine of University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA.
  • Groshen S; Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine of University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA.
  • Case J; Scripps Center for Organ Transplantation, Scripps Clinic and Green Hospital, La Jolla, CA.
  • Marsh CL; Scripps Center for Organ Transplantation, Scripps Clinic and Green Hospital, La Jolla, CA.
Liver Transpl ; 23(11): 1372-1383, 2017 11.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28834180
ABSTRACT
Transplantation of liver grafts from donation after cardiac death (DCD) is limited. To identify barriers of DCD liver utilization, all active US liver transplant centers (n = 138) were surveyed, and the responses were compared with the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) data. In total, 74 (54%) centers responded, and diversity in attitudes was observed, with many not using organ and/or recipient prognostic variables defined in prior studies and UNOS data analysis. Most centers (74%) believed lack of a system allowing a timely retransplant is a barrier to utilization. UNOS data demonstrated worse 1- and 5-year patient survival (PS) and graft survival (GS) in DCD (PS, 86% and 64%; GS, 82% and 59%, respectively) versus donation after brain death (DBD) recipients (PS, 90% and 71%; GS, 88% and 69%, respectively). Donor alanine aminotransferase (ALT), recipient Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD), and cold ischemia time (CIT) significantly impacted DCD outcomes to a greater extent than DBD outcomes. At 3 years, relisting and retransplant rates were 7.9% and 4.6% higher in DCD recipients. To optimize outcome, our data support the use of DCD liver grafts with CIT <6-8 hours in patients with MELD ≤ 20. In conclusion, standardization of donor and recipient criteria, defining the impact of ischemic cholangiopathy, addressing donor hospital policies, and developing a strategy for timely retransplant may help to expand the use of these organs. Liver Transplantation 23 1372-1383 2017 AASLD.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Obtenção de Tecidos e Órgãos / Padrões de Prática Médica / Transplante de Fígado / Doença Hepática Terminal / Sobrevivência de Enxerto Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Humans / Middle aged País como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Obtenção de Tecidos e Órgãos / Padrões de Prática Médica / Transplante de Fígado / Doença Hepática Terminal / Sobrevivência de Enxerto Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Humans / Middle aged País como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article