Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
[Efficacy of patient-controlled intravenous analgesia with hydromorphone hydrochloride plus flurbiprofen axetil after endoscopic sinus surgery].
Jiang, X Y; Shu, L W; Pan, C X.
Afiliação
  • Jiang XY; Department of Anesthesiology, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100730, China.
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi ; 97(32): 2516-2519, 2017 Aug 22.
Article em Zh | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28835059
ABSTRACT

Objective:

To evaluate the efficacy of patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA)with hydromorphone hydrochloride plusflurbiprofen axetil after endoscopic sinus surgery(ESS).

Methods:

One hundred patients of American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status Ⅰ or Ⅱ, scheduled for ESS under total intraveous anesthesia with postoperative PCIA in Beijing Tongren Hospital from October 2015 to April 2016 were randomly divided into 3 groups according to the different formula of PCIA pumpin each group Group A (hydromorphone hydrochloride 1 µg·kg(-1)·h(-1)+ flurbiprofen axetil 200 mg), Group B(hydromorphone hydrochloride 2 µg·kg(-1)·h(-1)), Group C( hydromorphone hydrochloride 1 µg·kg(-1)·h(-1)). The dosage of PCIA in each group was calculated for 50 h, and was diluted in 100 ml normal saline. All the pump was set up background infusion at a rate of 2 ml/h with a 2 ml bolus dose and a 15 min lock-time.Visual analogue scale (VAS) and Ramsay sedation scores at time points of postoperative 1, 4, 8, 12, 24, 48 h, the number of attempts to press bolus and rate of adverse effects within 48 h were recorded. The differences were compared among the groups.

Results:

VAS at postoperative 1, 4, 8, 12 h in Group A was (1.9±0.6), (1.8±0.6), (1.6±0.6), and (1.2±0.4) respectively, in Group B was (1.8±0.4), (1.7±0.7), (1.6±0.6), and (1.3±0.5) respectively, in Group C was (2.5±0.9), (1.7±0.7), (1.6±0.6), and (1.3±0.5) respectively. The difference among each group were statistically significant (F=8.661, 3.105, 4.903, 13.846, P<0.05). VAS in Group A was similar to that in Group B(P>0.05), but was lower than that in Group C(P<0.05). The number of attempts to press bolus within 48 h in group A was 1.4±1.0, which was less than in Group C(2.2±1.8 , P<0.05). Ramsay sedation score at postoperative 1, 4, 8 h in Group A was (2.4±0.6), (2.2±0.6), and (2.2±0.4) respectively, in Group B was (2.8±0.7), (2.6±0.7), and (2.4±0.6) respectively, in Group C was (2.3±0.6), (2.1±0.4), and (2.1±0.2) respectively. The difference among each group were statistically significant (F=5.660, 6.782, 7.141, P<0.05). Ramsay sedation score in group A was similar to that in Group C(P>0.05), but was lower than that in Group B(P<0.05). The total rate of adverse effects in Group A was 8.8%, which was similar to that in Group C (9.1%, χ(2)=0.001, P>0.05), but was significantly lower than that in Group B (42.5%, χ(2)=9.99, P<0.05).

Conclusion:

1 µg·kg(-1)·h(-1) hydromorphone hydrochloride plus 200 mg flurbiprofen axetil is effective on PCIA for patients after ESS and can reduce the dosage of hydromorphone hydrochloride and the rate of adverse effects as well.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Dor Pós-Operatória / Analgesia Controlada pelo Paciente / Hidromorfona Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Humans Idioma: Zh Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Dor Pós-Operatória / Analgesia Controlada pelo Paciente / Hidromorfona Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Humans Idioma: Zh Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article