Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Linking smokers to a quitline: randomized controlled effectiveness trial of a support person intervention that targets non-smokers.
Patten, Christi A; Boyle, Raymond; Tinkelman, David; Brockman, Tabetha A; Lukowski, Amy; Decker, Paul A; D'Silva, Joanne; Lichtenstein, Edward; Zhu, Shu-Hong.
Afiliação
  • Patten CA; Department of Psychology and Psychiatry, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
  • Boyle R; Department of Research Programs, ClearWay Minnesota SM, Minneapolis, MN 55425, USA.
  • Tinkelman D; Department of Health Initiatives, National Jewish Health, Denver, CO 80206, USA.
  • Brockman TA; Department of Psychology and Psychiatry, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
  • Lukowski A; Department of Health Initiatives, National Jewish Health, Denver, CO 80206, USA.
  • Decker PA; Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
  • D'Silva J; Department of Research Programs, ClearWay Minnesota SM, Minneapolis, MN 55425, USA.
  • Lichtenstein E; Department of Psychology, Oregon Research Institute, Eugene, OR 97403, USA.
  • Zhu SH; Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of California, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA.
Health Educ Res ; 32(4): 318-331, 2017 08 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28854569
ABSTRACT
Evidence-based treatments (e.g. quitlines) are greatly underutilized by smokers limiting their public health impact. A three-session phone intervention for nonsmoking family members and friends (i.e. support persons) was successful for increasing smoker quitline enrollment. To enhance the intervention's potential translatability, in this study, we delivered treatment for the non-smoker within ongoing quitline services and compared the efficacy of the three-call intervention to a streamlined version (one call). A total of 704 adult non-smokers (85% female, 95% White) wanting to help a smoker quit and recruited statewide in Minnesota participated in this randomized controlled trial with parallel groups. Non-smokers received mailed written materials and were randomly assigned to a control condition (no additional treatment, n = 235), or to a one- (n = 233) or three-call (n = 236) intervention delivered by quitline coaches. The main outcome was smoker quitline enrollment through 7-month follow-up. Smoker quitline enrollment was similar for those linked to non-smokers in the one- and three-call interventions (14.6% [34/233] and 14.8% [35/236]), and higher than for smokers linked to control participants (6.4% [15/235]), P = 0.006. Just one quitline coaching call delivered to non-smokers increased treatment enrollment among smokers. The reach of quitlines could be enhanced by targeting the social support network of smokers.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Apoio Social / Linhas Diretas / Abandono do Hábito de Fumar / Fumantes Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Apoio Social / Linhas Diretas / Abandono do Hábito de Fumar / Fumantes Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article