Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluation of previously embolized intracranial aneurysms: inter-and intra-rater reliability among neurosurgeons and interventional neuroradiologists.
Zuckerman, Scott L; Lakomkin, Nikita; Magarik, Jordan A; Vargas, Jan; Stephens, Marcus; Akinpelu, Babatunde; Spiotta, Alejandro M; Ahmed, Azam; Arthur, Adam S; Fiorella, David; Hanel, Ricardo; Hirsch, Joshua A; Hui, Ferdinand K; James, Robert F; Kallmes, David F; Meyers, Philip M; Niemann, David B; Rasmussen, Peter; Turner, Raymond D; Welch, Babu G; Mocco, J.
Afiliação
  • Zuckerman SL; Department of Neurosurgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
  • Lakomkin N; Department of Neurosurgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, USA.
  • Magarik JA; Department of Neurosurgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
  • Vargas J; Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.
  • Stephens M; Department of Neurosurgery, University of Arkansas, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA.
  • Akinpelu B; Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Washington, USA.
  • Spiotta AM; Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.
  • Ahmed A; Department of Neurosurgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
  • Arthur AS; Department of Neurosurgery, Semmes-Murphey Clinic, University of Tennessee Health Sciences Center, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.
  • Fiorella D; Department of Neurosurgery, Cerebrovascular Center, Stony Brook University Medical Center, Stony Brook, New York, USA.
  • Hanel R; Department of Lyerly Neurosurgery, Baptist Neurological Institute, Jacksonville, Florida, USA.
  • Hirsch JA; Neurointerventional Service, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Hui FK; Department of Radiology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
  • James RF; Department of Neurosurgery, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, Kentucky, USA.
  • Kallmes DF; Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
  • Meyers PM; Columbia University Medical Center, Departments of Neurosurgery and Radiology, New York, USA.
  • Niemann DB; Department of Neurosurgery, University of Arkansas, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA.
  • Rasmussen P; Department of Neurosurgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
  • Turner RD; Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.
  • Welch BG; Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.
  • Mocco J; Department of Neurosurgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, USA.
J Neurointerv Surg ; 10(5): 462-466, 2018 May.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28918386
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The angiographic evaluation of previously coiled aneurysms can be difficult yet remains critical for determining re-treatment.

OBJECTIVE:

The main objective of this study was to determine the inter-rater reliability for both the Raymond Scale and per cent embolization among a group of neurointerventionalists evaluating previously embolized aneurysms.

METHODS:

A panel of 15 neurointerventionalists examined 92 distinct cases of immediate post-coil embolization and 1 year post-embolization angiographs. Each case was presented four times throughout the study, along with alterations in demographics in order to evaluate intra-rater reliability. All respondents were asked to provide the per cent embolization (0-100%) and Raymond Scale grade (1-3) for each aneurysm. Inter-rater reliability was evaluated by computing weighted kappa values (for the Raymond Scale) and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) for per cent embolization.

RESULTS:

10 neurosurgeons and 5 interventional neuroradiologists evaluated 368 simulated cases. The agreement among all readers employing the Raymond Scale was fair (κ=0.35) while concordance in per cent embolization was good (ICC=0.64). Clinicians with fewer than 10 years of experience demonstrated a significantly greater level of agreement than the group with greater than 10 years (κ=0.39 and ICC=0.70 vs κ=0.28 and ICC=0.58). When the same aneurysm was presented multiple times, clinicians demonstrated excellent consistency when assessing per cent embolization (ICC=0.82), but moderate agreement when employing the Raymond classification (κ=0.58).

CONCLUSIONS:

Identifying the per cent embolization in previously coiled aneurysms resulted in good inter- and intra-rater agreement, regardless of years of experience. The strong agreement among providers employing per cent embolization may make it a valuable tool for embolization assessment in this patient population.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Aneurisma Intracraniano / Embolização Terapêutica / Neurocirurgiões / Radiologistas Tipo de estudo: Evaluation_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Aneurisma Intracraniano / Embolização Terapêutica / Neurocirurgiões / Radiologistas Tipo de estudo: Evaluation_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article