Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Assessment of Health Literacy and validation of single-item literacy screener (SILS) in a sample of Italian people.
Bonaccorsi, Guglielmo; Grazzini, Maddalena; Pieri, Luca; Santomauro, Francesca; Ciancio, Maria; Lorini, Chiara.
Afiliação
  • Bonaccorsi G; Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute, Università degli Studi di Firenze, Florence, Italy.
  • Grazzini M; Scuola di Specializzazione in Igiene e Medicina Preventiva, Università degli Studi di Firenze, Florence, Italy.
  • Pieri L; Scuola di Specializzazione in Igiene e Medicina Preventiva, Università degli Studi di Firenze, Florence, Italy.
  • Santomauro F; Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute, Università degli Studi di Firenze, Florence, Italy.
  • Ciancio M; Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute, Università degli Studi di Firenze, Florence, Italy.
  • Lorini C; Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute, Università degli Studi di Firenze, Florence, Italy.
Ann Ist Super Sanita ; 53(3): 205-212, 2017.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28956799
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Health literacy (HL) is a complex concept with multiple components; it involves the ability to effectively use and interpret texts, documents, and numbers. THE AIMS OF OUR STUDY WERE to measure HL levels among a sample of adult Italian patients; to develop and validate the Italian version of the single-item literacy screener (SILS); to assess the diagnostic accuracy of the SILS as an indicator of limited reading ability regarding health documents, compared to the newest vital sign (NVS).

METHODS:

The subjects were enrolled in emergency departments, primary care settings, and specialist departments. The Italian versions of the NVS and of the SILS were administered to the patients, as well as a questionnaire aimed in collected socio-demographic information.

RESULTS:

Overall, 174 patients completed the interview (compliance 87%). Considering the NVS, 24.1% of the subjects presented high likelihood of limited HL, 13.2% a possibility of limited HL, and 62.6% adequate HL. SILS has shown a good concurrent validity compared to NVS (Spearman's rho r = -0.679; p < 0.001). The diagnostic accuracy of the SILS was high. The best performance parameters in assessing the diagnostic accuracy of SILS are found to be for threshold value of 2 in in identifying subjects with high likelihood of limited HL at the NVS (sensitivity 83.3%; specificity 82.6%; accuracy 82.8%; positive predicted value 60.3%; negative predicted value 94%; Cohen's kappa 0.6).

CONCLUSION:

The Italian version of SILS - as an indicator of limited reading and understanding ability regarding health information - is a good tool to measure HL in comparison to more complex measurement instruments of functional HL, like NVS.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Letramento em Saúde Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Letramento em Saúde Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article