Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Population pharmacodynamic modelling of midazolam induced sedation in terminally ill adult patients.
Franken, Linda G; de Winter, Brenda C M; Masman, Anniek D; van Dijk, Monique; Baar, Frans P M; Tibboel, Dick; Koch, Birgit C P; van Gelder, Teun; Mathot, Ron A A.
Afiliação
  • Franken LG; Department of Hospital Pharmacy, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • de Winter BCM; Department of Hospital Pharmacy, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Masman AD; Palliative Care Centre, Laurens Cadenza, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • van Dijk M; Intensive Care, Department of Paediatric Surgery, Erasmus MC-Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Baar FPM; Intensive Care, Department of Paediatric Surgery, Erasmus MC-Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Tibboel D; Palliative Care Centre, Laurens Cadenza, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Koch BCP; Intensive Care, Department of Paediatric Surgery, Erasmus MC-Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • van Gelder T; Department of Hospital Pharmacy, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Mathot RAA; Department of Hospital Pharmacy, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Br J Clin Pharmacol ; 84(2): 320-330, 2018 02.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28960387
AIMS: Midazolam is the drug of choice for palliative sedation and is titrated to achieve the desired level of sedation. A previous pharmacokinetic (PK) study showed that variability between patients could be partly explained by renal function and inflammatory status. The goal of this study was to combine this PK information with pharmacodynamic (PD) data, to evaluate the variability in response to midazolam and to find clinically relevant covariates that may predict PD response. METHOD: A population PD analysis using nonlinear mixed effect models was performed with data from 43 terminally ill patients. PK profiles were predicted by a previously described PK model and depth of sedation was measured using the Ramsay sedation score. Patient and disease characteristics were evaluated as possible covariates. The final model was evaluated using a visual predictive check. RESULTS: The effect of midazolam on the sedation level was best described by a differential odds model including a baseline probability, Emax model and interindividual variability on the overall effect. The EC50 value was 68.7 µg l-1 for a Ramsay score of 3-5 and 117.1 µg l-1 for a Ramsay score of 6. Comedication with haloperidol was the only significant covariate. The visual predictive check of the final model showed good model predictability. CONCLUSION: We were able to describe the clinical response to midazolam accurately. As expected, there was large variability in response to midazolam. The use of haloperidol was associated with a lower probability of sedation. This may be a result of confounding by indication, as haloperidol was used to treat delirium, and deliria has been linked to a more difficult sedation procedure.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Assistência Terminal / Midazolam / Doente Terminal / Sedação Profunda / Hipnóticos e Sedativos / Modelos Biológicos Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Assistência Terminal / Midazolam / Doente Terminal / Sedação Profunda / Hipnóticos e Sedativos / Modelos Biológicos Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article