Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of the brainstem auditory evoked responses during sevoflurane or alfaxalone anaesthesia in adult cats.
Ros, Carlos; Soler, Carme; García de Carellán Mateo, Alejandra.
Afiliação
  • Ros C; Department of Small Animal Medicine and Surgery, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Catholic University of Valencia "San Vicente Mártir", Spain. Electronic address: carlos.ros@ucv.es.
  • Soler C; Department of Small Animal Medicine and Surgery, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Catholic University of Valencia "San Vicente Mártir", Spain.
  • García de Carellán Mateo A; Department of Small Animal Medicine and Surgery, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Catholic University of Valencia "San Vicente Mártir", Spain.
Vet Anaesth Analg ; 44(5): 1085-1090, 2017 Sep.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28993095
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To compare the effects of general anaesthesia using sevoflurane or alfaxalone on the brainstem auditory evoked response (BAER) test in adult healthy cats. STUDY

DESIGN:

Prospective, clinical, 'blinded', crossover study. ANIMALS Ten feral adult healthy cats.

METHODS:

Premedication consisted of dexmedetomidine (0.01 mg kg-1) intramuscularly (IM). The first general anaesthesia was induced and maintained with sevoflurane (treatment S) for physical examination, BAER test, complete blood tests, thoracic radiographs and abdominal ultrasound. The second general anaesthesia was induced with alfaxalone (treatment A) IM (2 mg kg-1) and maintained with alfaxalone (10 mg kg-1 hour-1) for the BAER test, followed by neutering surgery. The BAER recordings were compared for differences in latencies, amplitudes and waveform morphology. Data were analysed using Student's t test and Wilcoxon rank test for paired samples for parametric and non-parametric data, respectively. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.

RESULTS:

General anaesthesia was uneventful; normal BAER comprising five peaks could be identified in both treatments. Mean ± SD latencies were 1.05 ± 0.09, 1.83 ± 0.11, 2.52 ± 0.19, 3.43 ± 0.17 and 4.39 ± 0.15 ms and 1.03 ± 0.04, 1.81 ± 0.73, 2.53 ± 0.15, 3.37 ± 0.13 and 4.33 ± 0.13 ms in treatments S and A, respectively. Median (interquartile range) amplitudes were 2.83 (0.67), 1.27 (0.41), 0.30 (0.40), 1.05 (0.82), 0.61 (0.38) microvolts and 2.84 (1.21), 1.49 (1.18), 0.26 (0.32), 0.91 (0.50) and 0.92 (0.64) microvolts in treatments S and A, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in mean latencies or median amplitudes between both the anaesthetics. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE This study demonstrates that there were no statistically significant differences between both the anaesthetics on the BAER test in adult healthy cats. Moreover, two possible anaesthetic protocols are described for cats undergoing this electrodiagnostic test.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pregnanodionas / Potenciais Evocados Auditivos do Tronco Encefálico / Anestésicos / Éteres Metílicos Tipo de estudo: Guideline Limite: Animals Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pregnanodionas / Potenciais Evocados Auditivos do Tronco Encefálico / Anestésicos / Éteres Metílicos Tipo de estudo: Guideline Limite: Animals Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article