Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The impact of genetic counselors' use of facilitative strategies on cognitive and emotional processing of genetic risk disclosure for Alzheimer's disease.
Guan, Yue; Roter, Debra L; Wolff, Jennifer L; Gitlin, Laura N; Christensen, Kurt D; Roberts, J Scott; Green, Robert C; Erby, Lori H.
Afiliação
  • Guan Y; Department of Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. Electronic address: yguan@som.umaryland.edu.
  • Roter DL; Department of Health, Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
  • Wolff JL; Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
  • Gitlin LN; Department of Community Public Health, School of Nursing, Center for Innovative Care in Aging, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
  • Christensen KD; Division of Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Roberts JS; Department of Health Behavior and Health Education, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
  • Green RC; Division of Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA; Partners Personalized Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Erby LH; Social and Behavioral Research Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Patient Educ Couns ; 101(5): 817-823, 2018 05.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29203084
OBJECTIVES: To determine the impact of genetic counselor (GC) communication on cognitive and emotional processing of Alzheimer's disease (AD) risk information during discussions with patients with clinical diagnoses of mild cognitive impairment and their companion. METHODS: 79 recordings and transcripts of AD risk disclosure sessions collected as part of the fourth REVEAL Trial were coded using the Roter Interaction Analysis System (RIAS) and the Linguistic Inquiry Word Count (LIWC). Multilevel analyses were used to determine the association between GCs' use of communication facilitation strategies and patient and companion use of words indicative of cognitive and emotional processing. RESULTS: GC used somewhat more cognitive (14%) than emotional (10%) facilitation strategies. Both patients and companions used more words indicative of cognitive (18% and 17%) than emotional (6% and 5%) processing. GC use of facilitative strategies and patient and companion use of cognitive and emotional processing words were significantly associated in both unadjusted and adjusted models (all p-values<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: GCs' use of facilitative strategies assist in cognitive and emotional processing in a way that may be linked to therapeutic benefit. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: These findings highlight mechanisms through which GCs may assist patients and companions to better understand and cope with risk information.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Relações Profissional-Paciente / Família / Cognição / Comunicação / Revelação / Emoções / Doença de Alzheimer / Disfunção Cognitiva / Conselheiros / Aconselhamento Genético Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Relações Profissional-Paciente / Família / Cognição / Comunicação / Revelação / Emoções / Doença de Alzheimer / Disfunção Cognitiva / Conselheiros / Aconselhamento Genético Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article