Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Dusting versus Basketing during Ureteroscopy-Which Technique is More Efficacious? A Prospective Multicenter Trial from the EDGE Research Consortium.
Humphreys, Mitchell R; Shah, Ojas D; Monga, Manoj; Chang, Yu-Hui; Krambeck, Amy E; Sur, Roger L; Miller, Nicole L; Knudsen, Bodo E; Eisner, Brian H; Matlaga, Brian R; Chew, Ben H.
Afiliação
  • Humphreys MR; Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona.
  • Shah OD; Columbia University, New York, New York.
  • Monga M; Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
  • Chang YH; Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona.
  • Krambeck AE; Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana.
  • Sur RL; University of California-San Diego, San Diego, California.
  • Miller NL; Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee.
  • Knudsen BE; Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
  • Eisner BH; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Matlaga BR; Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland.
  • Chew BH; University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Electronic address: ben.chew@ubc.ca.
J Urol ; 199(5): 1272-1276, 2018 05.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29253579
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

There is scant evidence in the literature to support dusting vs active basket extraction during ureteroscopy for kidney stones. We prospectively evaluated and followed patients to determine which modality produced a higher stone-free rate with the fewest complications. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

Members of the Endourologic Disease Group for Excellence research consortium prospectively enrolled patients with a renal stone burden ranging from 5 to 20 mm in this study. A holmium laser was used and all patients were stented postoperatively. Ureteral access sheaths were used in 100% of basketing cases while sheaths were optional when dusting. The primary study outcome was the stone-free rate at 6 weeks as determined by x-ray and ultrasound.

RESULTS:

A total of 84 and 75 patients were enrolled in the basketing and dusting arms, respectively. Stones in the dusting group were significantly larger (mean ± SD stone area 96.1 ± 65.3 vs 63.3 ± 46.0 mm2, p <0.001). The stone-free rate was significantly higher in the basketing group on univariate analysis (74.3% vs 58.2%, p = 0.04) but not on multivariate analysis (1.9 OR, 95% CI 0.9-4.3, p = 0.11). In patients who underwent a basketing procedure operative time was 37.7 minutes longer than in those treated with a dusting procedure (95% CI 23.8-51.7, p <0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in complication rates, hospital readmissions or additional procedures between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS:

The stone-free rate was higher for active basket retrieval of fragments at short-term followup on univariate analysis but not on multivariate analysis. There was no difference in postoperative complications or procedures. The 2 techniques should be in the armamentarium of the urologist.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Complicações Pós-Operatórias / Cálculos Renais / Litotripsia a Laser / Ureteroscopia Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Complicações Pós-Operatórias / Cálculos Renais / Litotripsia a Laser / Ureteroscopia Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article