Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Diagnosing cancer in primary care: results from the National Cancer Diagnosis Audit.
Swann, Ruth; McPhail, Sean; Witt, Jana; Shand, Brian; Abel, Gary A; Hiom, Sara; Rashbass, Jem; Lyratzopoulos, Georgios; Rubin, Greg.
Afiliação
  • Swann R; National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service, Public Health England, London, and Cancer Research UK, London.
  • McPhail S; National Disease Registration, National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service, Public Health England, London.
  • Witt J; Cancer Research UK, London.
  • Shand B; National Disease Registration, National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service, Public Health England, London.
  • Abel GA; University of Exeter Clinical School, University of Exeter, Exeter.
  • Hiom S; Early Diagnosis and Cancer Intelligence, Cancer Research UK, London.
  • Rashbass J; National Disease Registration, National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service, Public Health England, London.
  • Lyratzopoulos G; National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service, Public Health England; Epidemiology of Cancer Healthcare and Outcome Group, University College London, London; Cambridge Centre for Health Services Research, University of Cambridge, Cambridge.
  • Rubin G; Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle; National Cancer Diagnosis Audit Steering Group, Cancer Research UK, London.
Br J Gen Pract ; 68(666): e63-e72, 2018 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29255111
BACKGROUND: Continual improvements in diagnostic processes are needed to minimise the proportion of patients with cancer who experience diagnostic delays. Clinical audit is a means of achieving this. AIM: To characterise key aspects of the diagnostic process for cancer and to generate baseline measures for future re-audit. DESIGN AND SETTING: Clinical audit of cancer diagnosis in general practices in England. METHOD: Information on patient and tumour characteristics held in the English National Cancer Registry was supplemented by information from GPs in participating practices. Data items included diagnostic timepoints, patient characteristics, and clinical management. RESULTS: Data were collected on 17 042 patients with a new diagnosis of cancer during 2014 from 439 practices. Participating practices were similar to non-participating ones, particularly regarding population age, urban/rural location, and practice-based patient experience measures. The median diagnostic interval for all patients was 40 days (interquartile range [IQR] 15-86 days). Most patients were referred promptly (median primary care interval 5 days [IQR 0-27 days]). Where GPs deemed diagnostic delays to have occurred (22% of cases), patient, clinician, or system factors were responsible in 26%, 28%, and 34% of instances, respectively. Safety netting was recorded for 44% of patients. At least one primary care-led investigation was carried out for 45% of patients. Most patients (76%) had at least one existing comorbid condition; 21% had three or more. CONCLUSION: The findings identify avenues for quality improvement activity and provide a baseline for future audit of the impact of 2015 National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidance on management and referral of suspected cancer.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Encaminhamento e Consulta / Detecção Precoce de Câncer / Medicina Geral / Auditoria Médica / Neoplasias Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Encaminhamento e Consulta / Detecção Precoce de Câncer / Medicina Geral / Auditoria Médica / Neoplasias Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article