Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Using social autopsy to understand maternal, newborn, and child mortality in low-resource settings: a systematic review of the literature.
Moyer, Cheryl A; Johnson, Cassidy; Kaselitz, Elizabeth; Aborigo, Raymond.
Afiliação
  • Moyer CA; a Departments of Learning Health Sciences and Obstetrics & Gynecology , University of Michigan Medical School , Ann Arbor , MI , USA.
  • Johnson C; b Global REACH , University of Michigan Medical School , Ann Arbor , MI , USA.
  • Kaselitz E; b Global REACH , University of Michigan Medical School , Ann Arbor , MI , USA.
  • Aborigo R; b Global REACH , University of Michigan Medical School , Ann Arbor , MI , USA.
Glob Health Action ; 10(1): 1413917, 2017.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29261449
BACKGROUND: Social, cultural, and behavioral factors are often potent upstream contributors to maternal, neonatal, and child mortality, especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Social autopsy is one method of identifying the impact of such factors, yet it is unclear how social autopsy methods are being used in LMICs. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to identify the most common social autopsy instruments, describe overarching findings across populations and geography, and identify gaps in the existing social autopsy literature. METHODS: A systematic search of the peer-reviewed literature from 2005 to 2016 was conducted. Studies were included if they were conducted in an LMIC, focused on maternal/neonatal/infant/child health, reported on the results of original research, and explicitly mentioned the use of a social autopsy tool. RESULTS: Sixteen articles out of 1950 citations were included, representing research conducted in 11 countries. Five different tools were described, with two primary conceptual frameworks used to guide analysis: Pathway to Survival and Three Delays models. Studies varied in methods for identifying deaths, and recall periods for respondents ranged from 6 weeks to 5+ years. Across studies, recognition of danger signs appeared to be high, while subsequent care-seeking was inconsistent. Cost, distance to facility, and transportation issues were frequently cited barriers to care-seeking, however, additional barriers were reported that varied by location. Gaps in the social autopsy literature include the lack of: harmonized tools and analytical methods that allow for cross-study comparisons, discussion of complexity of decision making for care seeking, qualitative narratives that address inconsistencies in responses, and the explicit inclusion of perspectives from husbands and fathers. CONCLUSION: Despite the nascence of the field, research across 11 countries has included social autopsy methods, using a variety of tools, sampling methods, and analytical frameworks to determine how social factors impact maternal, neonatal, and child health outcomes.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Autopsia / Mortalidade Infantil / Mortalidade Materna / Mortalidade da Criança / Países em Desenvolvimento Tipo de estudo: Health_economic_evaluation / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Systematic_reviews Limite: Child / Female / Humans / Infant / Newborn Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Autopsia / Mortalidade Infantil / Mortalidade Materna / Mortalidade da Criança / Países em Desenvolvimento Tipo de estudo: Health_economic_evaluation / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Systematic_reviews Limite: Child / Female / Humans / Infant / Newborn Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article