Identify Unsuitable Patients with Left Main Coronary Artery Disease in Intermediate SYNTAX Scores Treated by Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: With the follow-up extending to 5 years, the outcomes of SYNTAX (Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with TAXUS and Cardiac Surgery) trial were comparable between coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in left-main (LM) patients with intermediate SYNTAX scores of 23-32. A subdivision depending on SYNTAX score will help to identify unsuitable LM patients with intermediate SYNTAX scores to receive PCI treatment. METHODS: Between January 2011 and June 2013, 104 patients with LM Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) undergoing PCI were selected retrospectively. We compared clinical outcomes in patients with SYNTAX score <27 and ≥27. The follow-up time was 25.23 ± 7.92 months. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses and Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare various outcomes between two groups. RESULTS: Higher rates of repeated revascularization (18.2% versus 4.2%, P = .027) and major adverse cerebro-cardiovascular events (MACCE) (24.2% versus 7.0%, P = .014) were shown in patients with SYNTAX score ≥ 27. After multivariate adjustment, a significant higher risk of repeated revascularization (hazard ratio 6.25, 95% confidence interval 1.48 to 26.37, P = .013) and MACCE (hazard ratio 4.49, 95% confidence interval 1.41 to 14.35, P = .011) were also found in patients with SYNTAX score ≥ 27. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the higher rate of repeated revascularization and MACCE, patients with LM CAD and intermediate SYNTAX scores will need a subdivision to identity the one not benefit from PCI. CABG is still the standard treatment method for patients of LM CAD with a SYNTAX score of ≥ 27.