Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Decreased Use of Sphincter-Preserving Procedures Among African Americans with Rectal Cancer.
Arsoniadis, Elliot G; Fan, Yunhua; Jarosek, Stephanie; Gaertner, Wolfgang B; Melton, Genevieve B; Madoff, Robert D; Kwaan, Mary R.
Afiliação
  • Arsoniadis EG; Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA. arson001@umn.edu.
  • Fan Y; Institute for Health Informatics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA. arson001@umn.edu.
  • Jarosek S; Department of Urology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
  • Gaertner WB; Department of Urology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
  • Melton GB; Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
  • Madoff RD; Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
  • Kwaan MR; Institute for Health Informatics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 25(3): 720-728, 2018 Mar.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29282601
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Improved multimodality rectal cancer treatment has increased the use of sphincter-preserving surgery. This study sought to determine whether African American (AA) patients with rectal cancer receive sphincter-preserving surgery at the same rate as non-AA patients.

METHODS:

The study used the Nationwide Inpatient Sample for years 1998-2012 to compare AA and non-AA patients with rectal cancer undergoing low anterior resection or abdominoperineal resection. The logistic regression model was used to adjust for age, gender, admission type, Elixhauser comorbidity index, and hospital factors such as size, location (urban vs.rural), teaching status, and procedure volume.

RESULTS:

The search identified 22,697 patients, 1600 of whom were identified as AA. After adjustment for age and gender, the analysis showed that AA patients were less likely to undergo sphincter-preserving surgery than non-AA patients [odds ratio (OR) 0.70; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.63-0.78; p < 0.0001). After further adjustment for the Elixhauser comorbidity index, admission type, hospital-specific factors, and insurance status, the analysis showed that AA patients still were less likely to undergo sphincter-preserving surgery (OR 0.78; 95% CI 0.70-0.87; p < 0.0001). Although the proportion of non-AA patients undergoing sphincter-preserving surgery increased during the study period (p = 0.0003), this trend was not significant for the AA patients (p = 0.13).

CONCLUSION:

In this data analysis, the AA patients with rectal cancer had lower rates of sphincter-preserving surgery than the non-AA patients, even after adjustment for patient- and hospital-specific factors. Further work is required to elucidate why. Eliminating racial disparities in rectal cancer treatment should continue to be a priority for the surgical community.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Canal Anal / Neoplasias Retais / Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Digestório / Negro ou Afro-Americano / População Branca / Tratamentos com Preservação do Órgão Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Canal Anal / Neoplasias Retais / Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Digestório / Negro ou Afro-Americano / População Branca / Tratamentos com Preservação do Órgão Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article