Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Pain-Free Outcomes and Durability of Surgical Intervention for Trigeminal Neuralgia: A Comparison of Gamma Knife and Microvascular Decompression.
Mendelson, Zachary S; Velagala, Jayant R; Kohli, Gurkirat; Heir, Gary M; Mammis, Antonios; Liu, James K.
Afiliação
  • Mendelson ZS; Department of Neurological Surgery, Rutgers University, New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey, USA.
  • Velagala JR; Department of Neurological Surgery, Rutgers University, New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey, USA.
  • Kohli G; Department of Neurological Surgery, Rutgers University, New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey, USA.
  • Heir GM; Division of Temporomandibular Disorders and Orofacial Pain, Department of Diagnostic Sciences, Rutgers School of Dental Medicine, Newark, New Jersey, USA.
  • Mammis A; Department of Neurological Surgery, Rutgers University, New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey, USA.
  • Liu JK; Department of Neurological Surgery, Rutgers University, New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey, USA; Center for Skull Base and Pituitary Surgery, Rutgers Neurological Institute of New Jersey, Newark, New Jersey, USA. Electronic address: james.liu.md@rutgers.edu.
World Neurosurg ; 112: e732-e746, 2018 Apr.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29382615
OBJECTIVE: Treatment options for trigeminal neuralgia include microvascular decompression (MVD) and Gamma Knife surgery (GKS). There is no consensus which option is more effective at providing immediate and long-lasting pain relief. This study evaluated the differences between these 2 options in terms of rates of complete pain relief and pain-free recurrence. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted of published studies of MVD and GKS for treatment of trigeminal neuralgia from 2004 to 2014. Studies were selected using a MEDLINE/PubMed search and from subsequent inspection of references from articles found in the initial search. Common outcome measures reported in the studies were used for meta-analysis to make conclusions based on current available data. RESULTS: The MVD group included 18 articles with 2650 patients, and the GKS group included 25 articles with 2846 patients. MVD was found to have a significantly higher rate of initial pain-free outcomes (Barrow Neurological Institute grade I) compared with GKS (92.22% vs. 61.46%, P < 0.0001). MVD was also found to have a significantly higher rate of long-term pain-free outcomes at last follow-up compared with GKS (79.37% vs. 41.62%, P < 0.0001). MVD was found to have a similar rate of pain-free recurrence compared with GKS (14.93% vs. 19.38%, P = 0.2536). CONCLUSIONS: MVD may be a more effective intervention than GKS owing to higher rates of initial pain-free outcomes and long-term pain-free outcomes. There is a need for more consistent data reporting of outcomes for treatment of trigeminal neuralgia.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neuralgia do Trigêmeo / Radiocirurgia / Cirurgia de Descompressão Microvascular Tipo de estudo: Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neuralgia do Trigêmeo / Radiocirurgia / Cirurgia de Descompressão Microvascular Tipo de estudo: Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article