Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Cilostazol induced migraine does not respond to sumatriptan in a double blind trial.
Falkenberg, Katrine; Dunga, Bára Óladóttir Á; Guo, Song; Ashina, Messoud; Olesen, Jes.
Afiliação
  • Falkenberg K; Danish Headache Centre and Department of Neurology, University of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Copenhagen, DK-2600, Glostrup, Denmark.
  • Dunga BÓÁ; Danish Headache Centre and Department of Neurology, University of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Copenhagen, DK-2600, Glostrup, Denmark.
  • Guo S; Danish Headache Centre and Department of Neurology, University of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Copenhagen, DK-2600, Glostrup, Denmark.
  • Ashina M; Danish Headache Centre and Department of Neurology, University of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Copenhagen, DK-2600, Glostrup, Denmark.
  • Olesen J; Danish Headache Centre and Department of Neurology, University of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Copenhagen, DK-2600, Glostrup, Denmark. Jes.olesen@regionh.dk.
J Headache Pain ; 19(1): 11, 2018 Feb 02.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29396788
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Cilostazol is an inhibitor of phosphodiesterase 3 and thus causes accumulation of cAMP. It induces migraine-like attacks in migraine patients. Whether the cilostazol model responds to sumatriptan in migraine patients and therefore is valid for testing of future anti-migraine medications has never been investigated.

METHODS:

In a cross-over study, 30 patients received cilostazol (200 mg p.o.) on two separate days each day followed by oral self-administered placebo or sumatriptan 50 mg. We recorded headache characteristics and associated symptoms using a questionnaire. The 30 participants were asked to subsequently treat their spontaneous attacks with sumatriptan (50 mg) or placebo in a double-blind cross-over design and 15 participants did so.

RESULTS:

Cilostazol induced headache with some migraine characteristics in all participants; 18 patients on the sumatriptan day and 19 patients on the placebo day fulfilled criteria for a migraine-like attack. The difference in median headache intensity between sumatriptan and placebo at 2 h was not significant (p = 0.09), but it was at 4 h (p = 0.017). During spontaneous attacks, the difference between placebo and sumatriptan was not significant at 2 h (p = 0.26), but it was highly significant at 4 h (p = 0.006).

CONCLUSION:

The cilostazol model in migraine patients could not be validated by a sufficient sumatriptan response. The model may perhaps respond to new drugs that act intracellularly or directly on ion channels. TRIAL REGISTRATION The study is registered on clinicaltrials.gov ( NCT02486276 ).
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Sumatriptana / Agonistas do Receptor 5-HT1 de Serotonina / Transtornos de Enxaqueca Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Sumatriptana / Agonistas do Receptor 5-HT1 de Serotonina / Transtornos de Enxaqueca Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article