Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Impact of 2 generational improvements in colonoscopes on adenoma miss rates: results of a prospective randomized multicenter tandem study.
Pioche, Mathieu; Denis, Angélique; Allescher, Hans-Dieter; Andrisani, Gianluca; Costamagna, Guido; Dekker, Evelien; Fockens, Paul; Gerges, Christian; Groth, Stefan; Kandler, Jennis; Lienhart, Isabelle; Neuhaus, Horst; Petruzziello, Lucio; Schachschal, Guido; Tytgat, Kristien; Wallner, Jürgen; Weingart, Vincens; Touzet, Sandrine; Ponchon, Thierry; Rösch, Thomas.
Afiliação
  • Pioche M; Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Division, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Lyon, France.
  • Denis A; Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pôle Information médicale Evaluation Recherche, Lyon, France; Université de Lyon, Laboratoire Health Services and Performance Research (HESPER) Lyon, France.
  • Allescher HD; Department of Medicine, Klinikum Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Academic Teaching Hospital of the LMU Munich, Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany.
  • Andrisani G; Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Catholic University, Rome, Italy.
  • Costamagna G; Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Catholic University, Rome, Italy.
  • Dekker E; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
  • Fockens P; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
  • Gerges C; Department of Gastroenterology, Evangelisches Krankenhaus, Dusseldorf, Germany.
  • Groth S; Department of Interdisciplinary Endoscopy, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
  • Kandler J; Department of Gastroenterology, Evangelisches Krankenhaus, Dusseldorf, Germany.
  • Lienhart I; Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Division, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Lyon, France.
  • Neuhaus H; Department of Gastroenterology, Evangelisches Krankenhaus, Dusseldorf, Germany.
  • Petruzziello L; Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Catholic University, Rome, Italy.
  • Schachschal G; Department of Interdisciplinary Endoscopy, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
  • Tytgat K; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
  • Wallner J; Department of Medicine, Klinikum Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Academic Teaching Hospital of the LMU Munich, Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany.
  • Weingart V; Department of Medicine, Klinikum Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Academic Teaching Hospital of the LMU Munich, Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany.
  • Touzet S; Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pôle Information médicale Evaluation Recherche, Lyon, France; Université de Lyon, Laboratoire Health Services and Performance Research (HESPER) Lyon, France.
  • Ponchon T; Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Division, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Lyon, France.
  • Rösch T; Department of Interdisciplinary Endoscopy, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Gastrointest Endosc ; 88(1): 107-116, 2018 07.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29410020
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND

AIMS:

Numerous randomized studies have shown that changing certain features of colonoscopes, usually incorporated when switching from one endoscope generation to the next, mostly do not increase adenoma yield. There is, however, indirect evidence that it may be necessary to skip one instrument generation (ie, changing from one generation to the next but one) to achieve this effect.

METHODS:

We compared the latest-generation colonoscopes from one company (Olympus Exera III, 190-C) with the next to last one (Olympus 160/5-C) in a prospective multicenter study randomized for the order of colonoscopes in a tandem fashion, involving 2 different examiners. Patients with increased risk for colorectal neoplasia undergoing colonoscopy (positive fecal occult blood test, personal/familial history of colorectal cancer/adenoma, rectal bleeding, recent change in bowel movements) were included. The primary outcome was the adenoma miss rate with the 190 (190-C) colonoscope in comparison with the 160/5 colonoscope (160/5-C).

RESULTS:

A total of 856 patients (48.8% male; mean age, 58.3 years) with a personal (41%) or family (38%) history of colorectal neoplasia, rectal bleeding (19%), and other indications were included. Of the 429 patients in the 190-C first group, 16.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 13.0%-20.1%) had at least one adenoma missed during the first procedure, compared with 30.2% (95% CI, 25.9%-34.6%) in the group with 160/5-C first (P < .001). Similarly, the adenoma detection rate during the first colonoscopy was 43.8% versus 36.5% (P = .030) for 190-C versus 160/5-C, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS:

This randomized tandem trial showed lower adenoma miss rates and higher adenoma detection rates for the newer 190 colonoscopes compared with the 160/5 series. These results suggest that it takes multiple improvements, such as those implemented over 2 instrument generations, before an effect on adenoma (miss) rate can be observed. (Study registration number ISRCTN 2010-A01256-33.).
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Colorretais / Adenoma / Pólipos do Colo / Colonoscópios / Erros de Diagnóstico / Desenho de Equipamento Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Colorretais / Adenoma / Pólipos do Colo / Colonoscópios / Erros de Diagnóstico / Desenho de Equipamento Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article