Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Dosimetric impact of tumor treating field (TTField) transducer arrays onto treatment plans for glioblastomas - a planning study.
Straube, Christoph; Oechsner, Markus; Kampfer, Severin; Scharl, Sophia; Schmidt-Graf, Friederike; Wilkens, Jan J; Combs, Stephanie E.
Afiliação
  • Straube C; Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), 81675, Munich, Germany. Christoph.Straube@tum.de.
  • Oechsner M; Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany. Christoph.Straube@tum.de.
  • Kampfer S; Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), 81675, Munich, Germany.
  • Scharl S; Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), 81675, Munich, Germany.
  • Schmidt-Graf F; Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), 81675, Munich, Germany.
  • Wilkens JJ; Department of Neurology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany.
  • Combs SE; Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), 81675, Munich, Germany.
Radiat Oncol ; 13(1): 31, 2018 Feb 23.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29471879
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Tumor-Treating Fields (TTFields) are a novel treatment strategy for glioblastoma (GBM) that is approved for the use concomitantly to adjuvant chemotherapy. Preclinical data suggest a synergistic interaction of TTFields and radiotherapy (RT). However, the dosimetric uncertainties caused by the highly dense arrays have led to caution of applying the TTF setup during RT.

METHODS:

In a RW3 slab phantom we compared the MV- and kV-CT based planned dose with the measured dose. VMAT-plans were optimized on MV-CTs of an Alderson head phantom without TTF arrays and then re-calculated on the same phantom equipped with TTF arrays. Dose at organs at risk (OAR) and target volumes (PTVs) were compared.

RESULTS:

Measurements at a depth of 2, 3 and 4 cm of a RW 3 slab phantom show an attenuation due to TTField arrays of 3.4, 3.7 and 2.7% respectively. This was in-line with calculated attenuations based on MV-CT (1.2, 2.5 and 2.5%) but not with the attenuation expected from kV-CT based calculations (7.1, 8.2 and 8.6%). Consecutive MV-CT based VMAT planning and re-calculation reveals, that the conformity and homogeneity are not affected by the presence of TTField arrays. The dose at organs at risk (OAR) can show increases or decreases by < 0.5 Gy, which should be considered especially in cases next to the scull base.

CONCLUSION:

MV-CT based dose calculation results in reliable dose distributions also in the presence of TTField arrays. There is a small but clinically not relevant interaction between the TTField arrays and VMAT dose application. Thus, daily replacement of TTField arrays is not necessary in regard to deeply located OARs. RT is feasible, when a VMAT treatment plan is optimized to an array free planning CT. As the biologic effect of a concomitant treatment especially on OARs is currently unknown, a concomitant treatment should be performed only within clinical trials.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Transdutores / Planejamento da Radioterapia Assistida por Computador / Terapia por Estimulação Elétrica / Glioblastoma / Imagens de Fantasmas Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Transdutores / Planejamento da Radioterapia Assistida por Computador / Terapia por Estimulação Elétrica / Glioblastoma / Imagens de Fantasmas Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article