Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effect and cost-effectiveness of educating mothers about childhood DPT vaccination on immunisation uptake, knowledge, and perceptions in Uttar Pradesh, India: A randomised controlled trial.
Powell-Jackson, Timothy; Fabbri, Camilla; Dutt, Varun; Tougher, Sarah; Singh, Kultar.
Afiliação
  • Powell-Jackson T; Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
  • Fabbri C; Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
  • Dutt V; Sambodhi Research and Communications, Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India.
  • Tougher S; Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
  • Singh K; Sambodhi Research and Communications, Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India.
PLoS Med ; 15(3): e1002519, 2018 03.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29509769
BACKGROUND: To assess the effect of health information on immunisation uptake in rural India, we conducted an individually randomised controlled trial of health information messages targeting the mothers of unvaccinated or incompletely vaccinated children through home visits in rural Uttar Pradesh, India. METHODS AND FINDINGS: The study tested a brief intervention that provided mothers face-to-face with information on the benefits of the tetanus vaccine. Participants were 722 mothers of children aged 0-36 months who had not received 3 doses of diphtheria-pertussis-tetanus (DPT) vaccine (DPT3). Mothers were randomly assigned in a ratio of 1:1:1 to 1 of 3 study arms: mothers in the first treatment group received information framed as a gain (e.g., the child is less likely to get tetanus and more likely to be healthy if vaccinated), mothers in the second treatment group received information framed in terms of a loss (e.g., the child is more likely to get tetanus and suffer ill health if not vaccinated), and the third arm acted as a control group, with no information given to the mother. Surveys were conducted at baseline (September 2015) and after the intervention (April 2016). The primary outcome was the proportion of children who had received DPT3 measured after 7 months of follow-up. The analysis was by intention to treat. A total of 16 (2.2%) participants were lost to follow-up. The coverage of DPT3 was 28% in the control group and 43% in the pooled information groups, giving a risk difference of 15 percentage points (95% CI: 7% to 22%, p < 0.001) and a relative risk of 1.52 (95% CI: 1.2 to 1.9, p < 0.001). The information intervention increased the rate of measles vaccination by 22 percentage points (risk difference: 22%, 95% CI: 14% to 30%, p < 0.001; relative risk: 1.53, 95% CI: 1.29 to 1.80) and the rate of full immunisation by 14 percentage points (risk difference: 14%, 95% CI: 8% to 21%, p < 0.001; relative risk: 1.72, 95% CI: 1.29 to 2.29). It had a large positive effect on knowledge of the causes, symptoms, and prevention of tetanus but no effect on perceptions of vaccine efficacy. There was no difference in the proportion of children with DPT3 between the group that received information framed as a loss and the group that received information framed as a gain (risk difference: 4%, 95% CI: -5% to 13%; p = 0.352; relative risk: 1.11, 95% CI: 0.90 to 1.36). The cost per disability-adjusted life year averted of providing information was US$186, making the intervention highly cost-effective with respect to the WHO-recommended threshold of once the gross domestic product per capita (US$793 in the case of Uttar Pradesh). Key study limitations include the modest sample size for this trial, limiting power to detect small differences in the framing of information, and the potential for contamination among households. CONCLUSIONS: Providing mothers of unvaccinated/incompletely vaccinated children with information on tetanus and the benefits of DPT vaccination substantially increased immunisation coverage and was highly cost-effective. The framing of the health information message did not appear to matter. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial is registered with ISRCTN, number ISRCTN84560580.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Serviços Preventivos de Saúde / Vacina contra Difteria, Tétano e Coqueluche / Educação em Saúde / Imunização / Mães Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Health_economic_evaluation / Qualitative_research Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Newborn País como assunto: Asia Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Serviços Preventivos de Saúde / Vacina contra Difteria, Tétano e Coqueluche / Educação em Saúde / Imunização / Mães Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Health_economic_evaluation / Qualitative_research Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Newborn País como assunto: Asia Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article