Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The Magnitude of Androgen Receptor Positivity in Breast Cancer Is Critical for Reliable Prediction of Disease Outcome.
Ricciardelli, Carmela; Bianco-Miotto, Tina; Jindal, Shalini; Butler, Lisa M; Leung, Samuel; McNeil, Catriona M; O'Toole, Sandra A; Ebrahimie, Esmaeil; Millar, Ewan K A; Sakko, Andrew J; Ruiz, Alexandra I; Vowler, Sarah L; Huntsman, David G; Birrell, Stephen N; Sutherland, Robert L; Palmieri, Carlo; Hickey, Theresa E; Tilley, Wayne D.
Afiliação
  • Ricciardelli C; Dame Roma Mitchell Cancer Research Laboratories, Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
  • Bianco-Miotto T; Robinson Research Institute, Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
  • Jindal S; Dame Roma Mitchell Cancer Research Laboratories, Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
  • Butler LM; Robinson Research Institute, Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
  • Leung S; School of Agriculture, Food and Wine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
  • McNeil CM; Dame Roma Mitchell Cancer Research Laboratories, Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
  • O'Toole SA; Dame Roma Mitchell Cancer Research Laboratories, Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
  • Ebrahimie E; Genetic Pathology Evaluation Centre, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
  • Millar EKA; Cancer Research Program, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Sakko AJ; Cancer Research Program, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Ruiz AI; Dame Roma Mitchell Cancer Research Laboratories, Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
  • Vowler SL; Cancer Research Program, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Huntsman DG; Dame Roma Mitchell Cancer Research Laboratories, Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
  • Birrell SN; Dame Roma Mitchell Cancer Research Laboratories, Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
  • Sutherland RL; Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Robinson Way, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
  • Palmieri C; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
  • Hickey TE; Dame Roma Mitchell Cancer Research Laboratories, Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
  • Tilley WD; Cancer Research Program, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Clin Cancer Res ; 24(10): 2328-2341, 2018 05 15.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29514843
ABSTRACT

Purpose:

Consensus is lacking regarding the androgen receptor (AR) as a prognostic marker in breast cancer. The objectives of this study were to comprehensively review the literature on AR prognostication and determine optimal criteria for AR as an independent predictor of breast cancer survival.Experimental

Design:

AR positivity was assessed by immunostaining in two clinically validated primary breast cancer cohorts [training cohort, n = 219; validation cohort, n = 418; 77% and 79% estrogen receptor alpha (ERα) positive, respectively]. The optimal AR cut-point was determined by ROC analysis in the training cohort and applied to both cohorts.

Results:

AR was an independent prognostic marker of breast cancer outcome in 22 of 46 (48%) previous studies that performed multivariate analyses. Most studies used cut-points of 1% or 10% nuclear positivity. Herein, neither 1% nor 10% cut-points were robustly prognostic. ROC analysis revealed that a higher AR cut-point (78% positivity) provided optimal sensitivity and specificity to predict breast cancer survival in the training (HR, 0.41; P = 0.015) and validation (HR, 0.50; P = 0.014) cohorts. Tenfold cross-validation confirmed the robustness of this AR cut-point. Patients with ERα-positive tumors and AR positivity ≥78% had the best survival in both cohorts (P < 0.0001). Among the combined ERα-positive cases, those with comparable or higher levels of AR (ARERα-positivity ratio >0.87) had the best outcomes (P < 0.0001).

Conclusions:

This study defines an optimal AR cut-point to reliably predict breast cancer survival. Testing this cut-point in prospective cohorts is warranted for implementation of AR as a prognostic factor in the clinical management of breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res; 24(10); 2328-41. ©2018 AACR.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Mama / Receptores Androgênicos / Biomarcadores Tumorais Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Mama / Receptores Androgênicos / Biomarcadores Tumorais Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article