Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction with cardiofocal collimators: Comparison between IQ-SPECT, planar equilibrium radionuclide angiography, and cardiac magnetic resonance.
Pelletier-Galarneau, Matthieu; Finnerty, Vincent; Tan, Stephanie; Authier, Sebastien; Gregoire, Jean; Harel, Francois.
Afiliação
  • Pelletier-Galarneau M; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Montreal Heart Institute, 5000 Belanger, Montreal, QC, H1T1C8, Canada. Matthieu.pelletier-galarneau@icm-mhi.org.
  • Finnerty V; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Montreal Heart Institute, 5000 Belanger, Montreal, QC, H1T1C8, Canada.
  • Tan S; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Montreal Heart Institute, 5000 Belanger, Montreal, QC, H1T1C8, Canada.
  • Authier S; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Montreal Heart Institute, 5000 Belanger, Montreal, QC, H1T1C8, Canada.
  • Gregoire J; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Montreal Heart Institute, 5000 Belanger, Montreal, QC, H1T1C8, Canada.
  • Harel F; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Montreal Heart Institute, 5000 Belanger, Montreal, QC, H1T1C8, Canada.
J Nucl Cardiol ; 26(6): 1857-1864, 2019 12.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29520572
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

IQ-SPECT has been shown to significantly reduce acquisition time and administered dose while preserving image quality in myocardial perfusion imaging. Whether IQ-SPECT provides accurate left ventricular ejection fractions (LVEF) with gated blood pool SPECT (GBPS) remains unknown.

METHODS:

Sixty patients underwent IQ-SPECT GBPS and planar imaging. Among those patients, 11 underwent both cMRI and GBPS. GBPS LVEF, LVEDV, and LVESV were calculated using 2 validated software; QBS (Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, USA) and MHI (Montreal Heart Institute, Montreal, Canada). LVEF, LVEDV, and LVESV obtained with the different modalities were compared.

RESULTS:

Average planar LVEF was 48 ± 11% (mean ± SD), average LVEDV was 177 ± 59 mL (range 63 to 342 mL), and average LVESV was 96 ± 46 mL (range 16 to 234 mL). GBPS LVEF and their correlation coefficient with planar LVEF were 40 ± 12% (r = 0.70) and 44 ± 12% (r = 0.83) with QBS and MHI, respectively. Correlation coefficient between cMRI and planar LVEF was 0.65 and were 0.69 and 0.52 between cMRI and GBPS using QBS and MHI, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS:

LVEF calculated with GBPS using IQ-SPECT correlates with planar measurements. Correlation is best using the MHI method and variation is independent of LVEDV.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética / Angiografia / Tomografia Computadorizada de Emissão de Fóton Único / Coração Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética / Angiografia / Tomografia Computadorizada de Emissão de Fóton Único / Coração Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article