Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Invited review: Genetics and claw health: Opportunities to enhance claw health by genetic selection.
Heringstad, B; Egger-Danner, C; Charfeddine, N; Pryce, J E; Stock, K F; Kofler, J; Sogstad, A M; Holzhauer, M; Fiedler, A; Müller, K; Nielsen, P; Thomas, G; Gengler, N; de Jong, G; Ødegård, C; Malchiodi, F; Miglior, F; Alsaaod, M; Cole, J B.
Afiliação
  • Heringstad B; Department of Animal and Aquacultural Sciences, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, PO Box 5003, NO-1432 Ås, Norway.
  • Egger-Danner C; ZuchtData EDV-Dienstleistungen GmbH, Dresdner Str. 89/19, 1200 Vienna, Austria. Electronic address: egger-danner@zuchtdata.at.
  • Charfeddine N; CONAFE, ctra. Andalucía, Km 23,600, 28340 Valdemoro, Spain.
  • Pryce JE; Department of Economic Developments, Jobs, Transport and Resources and La Trobe University, Agribio, 5 Ring Road, Bundoora, VIC 3083, Australia.
  • Stock KF; IT Solutions for Animal Production (vit), Heinrich-Schroeder-Weg 1, D-27283 Verden, Germany.
  • Kofler J; University of Veterinary Medicine, Clinic for Ruminants, Veterinärplatz 1, 1210 Vienna, Austria.
  • Sogstad AM; TINE, Lakkegata 23, 0187 Oslo, Norway.
  • Holzhauer M; GD Animal Health, PO Box 9, 7400 AA Deventer, the Netherlands.
  • Fiedler A; Association of Certified Claw Trimmers (VgK e.V.), 81247 Munich, Germany.
  • Müller K; Freie Universitaet Berlin, Department of Veterinary Medicine, Clinic for Ruminants and Swine, Oertzenweg 19 b, 14163 Berlin, Germany.
  • Nielsen P; SEGES P/S, Agro Food Park 15, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark.
  • Thomas G; Institut de l'Élevage, Département Génétique et Phénotypes, 75595 Paris Cedex 12, France.
  • Gengler N; Université de Liège (ULg), Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech, Passage des Déportés 8, 5030 Gembloux, Belgium.
  • de Jong G; CRV, Wassenaarweg 20, 6843 NW, Arnhem, the Netherlands.
  • Ødegård C; Geno Breeding and A.I. Association, PO Box 5003, NO-1432 Ås, Norway.
  • Malchiodi F; CGIL, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1, Canada.
  • Miglior F; CGIL, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1, Canada; Canadian Dairy Network, Guelph, ON, N1K 1E5, Canada.
  • Alsaaod M; Clinic for Ruminants, Vetsuisse-Faculty, University of Bern, 3001, Switzerland.
  • Cole JB; Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD 20705.
J Dairy Sci ; 101(6): 4801-4821, 2018 Jun.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29525301
Routine recording of claw health status at claw trimming of dairy cattle has been established in several countries, providing valuable data for genetic evaluation. In this review, we examine issues related to genetic evaluation of claw health; discuss data sources, trait definitions, and data validation procedures; and present a review of genetic parameters, possible indicator traits, and status of genetic and genomic evaluations for claw disorders. Different sources of data and traits can be used to describe claw health. Severe cases of claw disorders can be identified by veterinary diagnoses. Data from lameness and locomotion scoring, activity information from sensors, and feet and leg conformation traits are used as auxiliary traits. The most reliable and comprehensive information is data from regular hoof trimming. In genetic evaluation, claw disorders are usually defined as binary traits, based on whether or not the claw disorder was present (recorded) at least once during a defined time period. The traits can be specific disorders, composite traits, or overall claw health. Data validation and editing criteria are needed to ensure reliable data at the trimmer, herd, animal, and record levels. Different strategies have been chosen, reflecting differences in herd sizes, data structures, management practices, and recording systems among countries. Heritabilities of the most commonly analyzed claw disorders based on data from routine claw trimming were generally low, with ranges of linear model estimates from 0.01 to 0.14, and threshold model estimates from 0.06 to 0.39. Estimated genetic correlations among claw disorders varied from -0.40 to 0.98. The strongest genetic correlations were found among sole hemorrhage (SH), sole ulcer (SU), and white line disease (WL), and between digital/interdigital dermatitis (DD/ID) and heel horn erosion (HHE). Genetic correlations between DD/ID and HHE on the one hand and SH, SU, or WL on the other hand were, in most cases, low. Although some of the studies were based on relatively few records and the estimated genetic parameters had large standard errors, there was, with some exceptions, consistency among studies. Various studies evaluate the potential of various data soureces for use in breeding. The use of hoof trimming data is recommended for maximization of genetic gain, although auxiliary traits, such as locomotion score and some conformation traits, may be valuable for increasing the reliability of genetic evaluations. Routine genetic evaluation of direct claw health has been implemented in the Netherlands (2010); Denmark, Finland, and Sweden (joint Nordic evaluation; 2011); and Norway (2014), and other countries plan to implement evaluations in the near future.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Seleção Genética / Bovinos / Doenças dos Bovinos / Doenças do Pé / Casco e Garras Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Animals Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Seleção Genética / Bovinos / Doenças dos Bovinos / Doenças do Pé / Casco e Garras Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Animals Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article