Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Does ultrasound-guided intervention during repeat cesarean sections improve uterine scar architecture and reduce the number of scars? A prospective controlled clinical intervention trial.
Seliger, Gregor; Muendane, Anne; Chaoui, Katharina; Hiller, Grit Gesine Ruth; Lautenschläger, Christine; Costa, Serban-Dan; Tchirikov, Michael.
Afiliação
  • Seliger G; Maternity Clinic/Perinatal Treatment Center, Center of Fetal Surgery, University Hospital Halle, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg/Faculty of Medicine, Halle (Saale), ST, Germany.
  • Muendane A; Maternity Clinic/Perinatal Treatment Center, Center of Fetal Surgery, University Hospital Halle, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg/Faculty of Medicine, Halle (Saale), ST, Germany.
  • Chaoui K; Maternity Clinic/Perinatal Treatment Center, Center of Fetal Surgery, University Hospital Halle, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg/Faculty of Medicine, Halle (Saale), ST, Germany.
  • Hiller GGR; Institute for Pathology, University Hospital Halle, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg/Faculty of Medicine, Halle (Saale), ST, Germany.
  • Lautenschläger C; Institute for Medical Epidemiology, Biometrics and Computer Science, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg/Faculty of Medicine, Halle (Saale), ST, Germany.
  • Costa SD; Women's Clinic, University Hospital Magdeburg, Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg/Faculty of Medicine, Magdeburg, ST, Germany.
  • Tchirikov M; Maternity Clinic/Perinatal Treatment Center, Center of Fetal Surgery, University Hospital Halle, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg/Faculty of Medicine, Halle (Saale), ST, Germany.
J Perinat Med ; 46(8): 857-866, 2018 Oct 25.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29570454
ABSTRACT
Purpose To evaluate whether intraoperative ultrasound-guided detection and resection of the uterine scar during repeat/second cesarean can reduce the number of scars and improve uterine scar architecture. Materials and methods A prospective controlled clinical intervention trial was performed with the following groups control group 1 (CS1-G) first cesarean; control group 2 (CS2-G) second cesarean utilizing the usual procedure and intervention group (Int-G) repeat/second cesarean with intervention. Transvaginal ultrasound scans were performed 6-9 months after each cesarean. Both primary (double scarring rate) and secondary outcomes [deficiency ratio=d/(b+d)] were analyzed. The deficiency ratio describes the thinning of the remaining myometrium (d=residual myometrial thickness) over the "apparent" defect (b=scar depth). Results In total, 124 of the 156 recruited women were examined, eight were excluded from analysis. The double scarring rate decreased from 42.9% (12/28) in CS2-G to 7.1% (2/28) in the Int-G [difference 35.8%; 95% confidence interval (CI) (13.2, 54.5); P=0.002]. Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed a significant difference between CS2-G and the Int-G in the deficiency ratio adjusted for elective/primary cesareans, with thicker remaining myometrium over the scar defect in the Int-G [difference -0.24; 95% CI (-0.34, -0.15); P<0.001]. Conclusion Ultrasound-guided resection of the uterine scar area during repeat cesareans reduces the scarring rate and improves thickness of the remaining myometrium as detected by ultrasonography 6-9 months postoperatively.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Cicatriz / Ultrassonografia de Intervenção / Recesariana / Miométrio Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Cicatriz / Ultrassonografia de Intervenção / Recesariana / Miométrio Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article