Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A bibliometric analysis of systematic reviews on vaccines and immunisation.
Fernandes, Silke; Jit, Mark; Bozzani, Fiammetta; Griffiths, Ulla K; Scott, J Anthony G; Burchett, Helen E D.
Afiliação
  • Fernandes S; London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, UK. Electronic address: silke.fernandes@lshtm.ac.uk.
  • Jit M; London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, UK; Modelling and Economics Unit, Public Health England, 61 Colindale Avenue, London NW9 5EQ, UK.
  • Bozzani F; London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, UK.
  • Griffiths UK; London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, UK; UNICEF, Health Section, Programme Division, 3 UN Plaza, Room 816, New York, NY 10017, United States.
  • Scott JAG; London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, UK.
  • Burchett HED; London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, UK.
Vaccine ; 36(17): 2254-2261, 2018 04 19.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29576305
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

SYSVAC is an online bibliographic database of systematic reviews and systematic review protocols on vaccines and immunisation compiled by the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine and hosted by the World Health Organization (WHO) through their National Immunization Technical Advisory Groups (NITAG) resource centre (www.nitag-resource.org). Here the development of the database and a bibliometric review of its content is presented, describing trends in the publication of policy-relevant systematic reviews on vaccines and immunisation from 2008 to 2016. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

Searches were conducted in seven scientific databases according to a standardized search protocol, initially in 2014 with the most recent update in January 2017. Abstracts and titles were screened according to specific inclusion criteria. All included publications were coded into relevant categories based on a standardized protocol and subsequently analysed to look at trends in time, topic, area of focus, population and geographic location.

RESULTS:

After screening for inclusion criteria, 1285 systematic reviews were included in the database. While in 2008 there were only 34 systematic reviews on a vaccine-related topic, this increased to 322 in 2016. The most frequent pathogens/diseases studied were influenza, human papillomavirus and pneumococcus. There were several areas of duplication and overlap.

DISCUSSION:

As more systematic reviews are published it becomes increasingly time-consuming for decision-makers to identify relevant information among the ever-increasing volume available. The risk of duplication also increases, particularly given the current lack of coordination of systematic reviews on vaccine-related questions, both in terms of their commissioning and their execution. The SYSVAC database offers an accessible catalogue of vaccine-relevant systematic reviews with, where possible access or a link to the full-text.

CONCLUSIONS:

SYSVAC provides a freely searchable platform to identify existing vaccine-policy-relevant systematic reviews. Systematic reviews will need to be assessed adequately for each specific question and quality.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Vacinas Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans País como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Vacinas Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans País como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article