Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Low Risk of Pulmonary Vein Stenosis After Contemporary Atrial Fibrillation Ablation - Lessons From Repeat Procedures After Radiofrequency Current, Cryoballoon, and Laser Balloon.
Nagase, Takahiko; Bordignon, Stefano; Perrotta, Laura; Bologna, Fabrizio; Weise, Felix K; Konstantinou, Athanasios; Kato, Ritsushi; Schmidt, Boris; Chun, Julian K R.
Afiliação
  • Nagase T; Cardio-angiological Center Bethanien, Agaplesion Markus Hospital, Medical Clinic III.
  • Bordignon S; Cardio-angiological Center Bethanien, Agaplesion Markus Hospital, Medical Clinic III.
  • Perrotta L; Cardio-angiological Center Bethanien, Agaplesion Markus Hospital, Medical Clinic III.
  • Bologna F; Cardio-angiological Center Bethanien, Agaplesion Markus Hospital, Medical Clinic III.
  • Weise FK; Cardio-angiological Center Bethanien, Agaplesion Markus Hospital, Medical Clinic III.
  • Konstantinou A; Cardio-angiological Center Bethanien, Agaplesion Markus Hospital, Medical Clinic III.
  • Kato R; Department of Cardiology, International Medical Center, Saitama Medical University.
  • Schmidt B; Cardio-angiological Center Bethanien, Agaplesion Markus Hospital, Medical Clinic III.
  • Chun JKR; Cardio-angiological Center Bethanien, Agaplesion Markus Hospital, Medical Clinic III.
Circ J ; 82(6): 1558-1565, 2018 05 25.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29618679
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The incidence of pulmonary vein stenosis (PVS) after AF ablation following contemporary procedures remains unclear. We compared the incidence of PVS/narrowing (PVS/N) after PV isolation (PVI) for (1) 3-D mapping-guided wide-area encircling irrigated radiofrequency current (RFC) ablation; (2) first-third-generation big cryoballoon (CB1-3) ablation; and (3) laser balloon (LB) ablation.Methods and 

Results:

All patients undergoing a second procedure between January 2012 and November 2016 were subgrouped according to index ablation (PVI) RFC; CB; or LB. PVS/N was classified using PV diameter ratio (second/index procedure) on selective PV angiogram performed before ablation mild, 25-49%; moderate, 50-74%; or severe, ≥75%. A total of 344 patients (1,362 PV) were analyzed (RFC, n=211; 840 PV; CB1, n=21; 82 PV; CB2,3, n=64; 250 PV; LB, n=48; 190 PV). In the LB group, 45 patients (94%) were treated with dose ≥8.5 W. Second procedures were performed on average 14.9±14.1 months after the index procedure. Mild PVS/N was observed in 18.4%, 9.5% and 3.6% of PV in the LB, RFC and CB groups, respectively (P<0.01). Moderate PVS was recognized in 2 PV (0.1%; RFC, LB). Severe PVS was never observed, and no PV intervention/surgery was required.

CONCLUSIONS:

The risk for significant PVS is low after RFC/CB. The incidence of mild PVS/N was highest after standard-dose LB ablation and lowest after high-dose CB ablation.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fibrilação Atrial / Ablação por Cateter / Técnicas de Ablação / Estenose de Veia Pulmonar Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fibrilação Atrial / Ablação por Cateter / Técnicas de Ablação / Estenose de Veia Pulmonar Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article