Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Quantitative diffusion MRI using reduced field-of-view and multi-shot acquisition techniques: Validation in phantoms and prostate imaging.
Zhang, Yuxin; Holmes, James; Rabanillo, Iñaki; Guidon, Arnaud; Wells, Shane; Hernando, Diego.
Afiliação
  • Zhang Y; Department of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin Madison, Madison, WI, United States; Department of Radiology, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin Madison, Madison, WI, United States.
  • Holmes J; Department of Radiology, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin Madison, Madison, WI, United States.
  • Rabanillo I; Laboratorio MR de Procesado de Imagen, Universidad de Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain.
  • Guidon A; Applications and Workflow, GE Healthcare, Boston, MA, United States.
  • Wells S; Department of Radiology, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin Madison, Madison, WI, United States.
  • Hernando D; Department of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin Madison, Madison, WI, United States; Department of Radiology, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin Madison, Madison, WI, United States. Electronic address: dhernando@wisc.edu.
Magn Reson Imaging ; 51: 173-181, 2018 09.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29678540
PURPOSE: To evaluate the reproducibility of quantitative diffusion measurements obtained with reduced Field of View (rFOV) and Multi-shot EPI (msEPI) acquisitions, using single-shot EPI (ssEPI) as a reference. METHODS: Diffusion phantom experiments, and prostate diffusion-weighted imaging in healthy volunteers and patients with known or suspected prostate cancer were performed across the three different sequences. Quantitative diffusion measurements of apparent diffusion coefficient, and diffusion kurtosis parameters (healthy volunteers), were obtained and compared across diffusion sequences (rFOV, msEPI, and ssEPI). Other possible confounding factors like b-value combinations and acquisition parameters were also investigated. RESULTS: Both msEPI and rFOV have shown reproducible quantitative diffusion measurements relative to ssEPI; no significant difference in ADC was observed across pulse sequences in the standard diffusion phantom (p = 0.156), healthy volunteers (p ≥ 0.12) or patients (p ≥ 0.26). The ADC values within the non-cancerous central gland and peripheral zone of patients were 1.29 ±â€¯0.17 × 10-3 mm2/s and 1.74 ±â€¯0.23 × 10-3 mm2/s respectively. However, differences in quantitative diffusion parameters were observed across different number of averages for rFOV, and across b-value groups and diffusion models for all the three sequences. CONCLUSION: Both rFOV and msEPI have the potential to provide high image quality with reproducible quantitative diffusion measurements in prostate diffusion MRI.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Próstata / Interpretação de Imagem Assistida por Computador / Imagem de Difusão por Ressonância Magnética Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Evaluation_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Próstata / Interpretação de Imagem Assistida por Computador / Imagem de Difusão por Ressonância Magnética Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Evaluation_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article