Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Thermal effects of Ho: YAG laser lithotripsy: real-time evaluation in an in vitro model.
Hein, Simon; Petzold, Ralf; Schoenthaler, Martin; Wetterauer, Ulrich; Miernik, Arkadiusz.
Afiliação
  • Hein S; Division of Urotechnology, Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Centre - University of Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Str. 55, 79106, Freiburg, Germany. simon.hein@uniklinik-freiburg.de.
  • Petzold R; Division of Urotechnology, Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Centre - University of Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Str. 55, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
  • Schoenthaler M; Division of Urotechnology, Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Centre - University of Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Str. 55, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
  • Wetterauer U; Division of Urotechnology, Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Centre - University of Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Str. 55, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
  • Miernik A; Division of Urotechnology, Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Centre - University of Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Str. 55, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
World J Urol ; 36(9): 1469-1475, 2018 Sep.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29691640
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To evaluate the thermal effect of HoYAG laser lithotripsy in a standardized in vitro model via real-time temperature measurement.

METHODS:

Our model comprised a 20 ml test tube simulating the renal pelvis that was immersed in a 37 °C water bath. Two different laser fibers [FlexiFib (15-45 W), RigiFib 1000 (45-100 W), LISA laser products OHG, Katlenburg-Lindau, Germany] were placed in the test tube. An HoYAG 100 W laser was used in all experiments (LISA). Each experiment involved 120 s of continuous laser application, and was repeated five times. Different laser settings (high vs. low frequency, high vs. low energy, and long vs. short pulse duration), irrigation rates (0 up to 100 ml/min, realized by several pumps), and human calcium oxalate stone samples were analyzed. Temperature data were acquired by a real-time data logger with thermocouples (PICO Technology, Cambridgeshire, UK). Real-time measurements were assessed using MatLab®.

RESULTS:

Laser application with no irrigation results in a rapid increase in temperature up to ∆28 K, rising to 68 °C at 100 W. Low irrigation rates yield significantly higher temperature outcomes. Higher irrigation rates result immediately in a lower temperature rise. High irrigation rates of 100 ml/min result in a temperature rise of 5 K at the highest laser power setting (100 W).

CONCLUSIONS:

HoYAG laser lithotripsy might be safe provided that there is sufficient irrigation. However, high power and low irrigation resulted in potentially tissue-damaging temperatures. Laser devices should, therefore, always be applied in conjunction with continuous, closely monitored irrigation whenever performing HoYAG laser lithotripsy.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Litotripsia a Laser / Temperatura Alta Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Litotripsia a Laser / Temperatura Alta Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article