Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Preventability of Early Versus Late Hospital Readmissions in a National Cohort of General Medicine Patients.
Graham, Kelly L; Auerbach, Andrew D; Schnipper, Jeffrey L; Flanders, Scott A; Kim, Christopher S; Robinson, Edmondo J; Ruhnke, Gregory W; Thomas, Larissa R; Kripalani, Sunil; Vasilevskis, Eduard E; Fletcher, Grant S; Sehgal, Neil J; Lindenauer, Peter K; Williams, Mark V; Metlay, Joshua P; Davis, Roger B; Yang, Julius; Marcantonio, Edward R; Herzig, Shoshana J.
Afiliação
  • Graham KL; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (K.L.G., R.B.D., J.Y., E.R.M., S.J.H.).
  • Auerbach AD; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California (A.D.A.).
  • Schnipper JL; Harvard Medical School and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts (J.L.S.).
  • Flanders SA; University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan (S.A.F.).
  • Kim CS; University of Washington, Seattle, Washington (C.S.K.).
  • Robinson EJ; Value Institute, Christiana Care Health System, Wilmington, Delaware (E.J.R.).
  • Ruhnke GW; University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois (G.W.R.).
  • Thomas LR; University of California, San Francisco, at Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco, California (L.R.T.).
  • Kripalani S; Center for Clinical Quality and Implementation Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee (S.K.).
  • Vasilevskis EE; Center for Quality Aging at Vanderbilt University Medical Center and VA Tennessee Valley Healthcare System Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, Nashville, Tennessee (E.E.V.).
  • Fletcher GS; Harborview Medical Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington (G.S.F.).
  • Sehgal NJ; University of Maryland School of Public Health, College Park, Maryland (N.J.S.).
  • Lindenauer PK; Institute for Healthcare Delivery and Population Science, University of Massachusetts Medical School-Baystate, Springfield, Massachusetts (P.K.L.).
  • Williams MV; Center for Health Services Research, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky (M.V.W.).
  • Metlay JP; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts (J.P.M.).
  • Davis RB; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (K.L.G., R.B.D., J.Y., E.R.M., S.J.H.).
  • Yang J; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (K.L.G., R.B.D., J.Y., E.R.M., S.J.H.).
  • Marcantonio ER; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (K.L.G., R.B.D., J.Y., E.R.M., S.J.H.).
  • Herzig SJ; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (K.L.G., R.B.D., J.Y., E.R.M., S.J.H.).
Ann Intern Med ; 168(11): 766-774, 2018 06 05.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29710243
Background: Many experts believe that hospitals with more frequent readmissions provide lower-quality care, but little is known about how the preventability of readmissions might change over the postdischarge time frame. Objective: To determine whether readmissions within 7 days of discharge differ from those between 8 and 30 days after discharge with respect to preventability. Design: Prospective cohort study. Setting: 10 academic medical centers in the United States. Patients: 822 adults readmitted to a general medicine service. Measurements: For each readmission, 2 site-specific physician adjudicators used a structured survey instrument to determine whether it was preventable and measured other characteristics. Results: Overall, 36.2% of early readmissions versus 23.0% of late readmissions were preventable (median risk difference, 13.0 percentage points [interquartile range, 5.5 to 26.4 percentage points]). Hospitals were identified as better locations for preventing early readmissions (47.2% vs. 25.5%; median risk difference, 22.8 percentage points [interquartile range, 17.9 to 31.8 percentage points]), whereas outpatient clinics (15.2% vs. 6.6%; median risk difference, 10.0 percentage points [interquartile range, 4.6 to 12.2 percentage points]) and home (19.4% vs. 14.0%; median risk difference, 5.6 percentage points [interquartile range, -6.1 to 17.1 percentage points]) were better for preventing late readmissions. Limitation: Physician adjudicators were not blinded to readmission timing, community hospitals were not included in the study, and readmissions to nonstudy hospitals were not included in the results. Conclusion: Early readmissions were more likely to be preventable and amenable to hospital-based interventions. Late readmissions were less likely to be preventable and were more amenable to ambulatory and home-based interventions. Primary Funding Source: Association of American Medical Colleges.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Readmissão do Paciente / Centros Médicos Acadêmicos Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Readmissão do Paciente / Centros Médicos Acadêmicos Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article