Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Development of a patient-reported outcome measure of recovery after abdominal surgery: a hypothesized conceptual framework.
Alam, Roshni; Figueiredo, Sabrina M; Balvardi, Saba; Nauche, Bénédicte; Landry, Tara; Lee, Lawrence; Mayo, Nancy E; Feldman, Liane S; Fiore, Julio F.
Afiliação
  • Alam R; Steinberg-Bernstein Centre for Minimally Invasive Surgery and Innovation, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.
  • Figueiredo SM; Department of Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.
  • Balvardi S; School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
  • Nauche B; Division of Clinical Epidemiology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
  • Landry T; Steinberg-Bernstein Centre for Minimally Invasive Surgery and Innovation, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.
  • Lee L; Department of Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.
  • Mayo NE; Medical Libraries, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.
  • Feldman LS; Medical Libraries, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.
  • Fiore JF; Steinberg-Bernstein Centre for Minimally Invasive Surgery and Innovation, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Surg Endosc ; 32(12): 4874-4885, 2018 12.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29777351
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

We initiated a research program to develop a novel patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) to assess postoperative recovery from the perspective of abdominal surgery patients. In light of FDA recommendations, the first stage of our program aimed to, based on previous literature and expert input, develop a hypothesized conceptual framework portraying the health domains that are potentially relevant to the process of recovery after abdominal surgery.

METHODS:

This study was conducted in three phases (1) systematic review to identify PROMs with measurement properties appraised in the context of recovery after abdominal surgery, (2) content analysis to categorize the health domains covered by the PROMs according to the ICF, and (3) two-round Delphi study to gain expert input regarding which of these health domains are relevant to the process of recovery. Participants were experts in perioperative care identified through two major surgical societies (35 invited).

RESULTS:

The systematic review identified 19 PROMs covering 66 ICF domains. 23 experts (66%) participated in the Delphi process. After Round 2, experts agreed that 22 health domains (8 body functions, 14 activities and participation) are potentially relevant to the process of recovery after abdominal surgery. These domains were organized into a diagram, representing our hypothesized conceptual framework.

CONCLUSIONS:

This hypothesized conceptual framework is an important first step in our research program and will be further refined based on in-depth qualitative interviews with patients. The sound methodological approach used to derive this framework may be valuable for studies aimed to develop PROMs according to FDA standards.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Recuperação de Função Fisiológica / Abdome / Medidas de Resultados Relatados pelo Paciente Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Recuperação de Função Fisiológica / Abdome / Medidas de Resultados Relatados pelo Paciente Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article