Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Early recurrence after cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC).
Tan, Grace Hwei Ching; Chia, Claramae Shulyn; Tan, Sze Huey; Soo, Khee Chee; Teo, Melissa Ching Ching.
Afiliação
  • Tan GHC; Division of Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
  • Chia CS; Division of Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
  • Tan SH; Division of Clinical Trials and Epidemiological Sciences, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
  • Soo KC; Division of Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
  • Teo MCC; Division of Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Drive, Singapore, 169610, Singapore. Melissa.Teo.C.C@nccs.com.sg.
Int J Clin Oncol ; 23(5): 989-998, 2018 Oct.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29869757
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) are used in the management of selected peritoneal malignancies. While most patients achieve long-term disease-free survival, there remains a group with early recurrence (ER). We aim to investigate the clinical factors associated with ER.

METHODS:

A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database of CRS-HIPEC patients treated between April 2001 and Feb 2016 was performed. ER was defined as recurrence within 12 months of CRS-HIPEC. Patients were stratified according to time to recurrence and only patients with at least 12-month follow-up were included. Perioperative factors were investigated, and subgroup analyses of colorectal, ovarian and appendiceal groups were performed.

RESULTS:

Of the 144 patients included, 30.6% were colorectal, 36.8% ovarian and primary peritoneal, 24.3% appendiceal, 2.1% mesothelioma and 6.3% were of other origins. Thirty-nine patients (27%) suffered ER. Univariable and multivariable analyses revealed that primary tumour type (p = 0.02) and post-CRS adjuvant treatment (p = 0.04) were associated with ER. Appendiceal patients had a lower odds of ER compared to colorectal patients [OR = 0.15 (0.043-0.502) p < 0.002]. Patients who received post-CRS adjuvant treatment had a lower odds of ER than patients without adjuvant treatment [OR = 0.32; (0.128-0.818) p = 0.02].

CONCLUSION:

There remains a 27% risk of ER after CRS-HIPEC. Better patient selection and the administration of adjuvant chemotherapy may help to reduce ER.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Peritoneais / Quimioterapia do Câncer por Perfusão Regional / Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica / Procedimentos Cirúrgicos de Citorredução / Hipertermia Induzida / Recidiva Local de Neoplasia Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Peritoneais / Quimioterapia do Câncer por Perfusão Regional / Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica / Procedimentos Cirúrgicos de Citorredução / Hipertermia Induzida / Recidiva Local de Neoplasia Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article