Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Low-cost three-dimensional printed phantom for neuraxial anesthesia training: Development and comparison to a commercial model.
Mashari, Azad; Montealegre-Gallegos, Mario; Jeganathan, Jelliffe; Yeh, Lu; Qua Hiansen, Joshua; Meineri, Massimiliano; Mahmood, Feroze; Matyal, Robina.
Afiliação
  • Mashari A; Department of Anesthesia and Pain Management, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Montealegre-Gallegos M; Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Jeganathan J; Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
  • Yeh L; Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
  • Qua Hiansen J; Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
  • Meineri M; Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
  • Mahmood F; Department of Anesthesiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
  • Matyal R; Department of Anesthesia and Pain Management, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
PLoS One ; 13(6): e0191664, 2018.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29912877
METHODS: Anonymized CT DICOM data was segmented to create a 3D model of the lumbar spine. The 3D model was modified, placed inside a digitally designed housing unit and fabricated on a desktop 3D printer using polylactic acid (PLA) filament. The model was filled with an echogenic solution of gelatin with psyllium fiber. Twenty-two staff anesthesiologists performed a spinal and epidural on the 3D printed simulator and a commercially available Simulab phantom. Participants evaluated the tactile and ultrasound imaging fidelity of both phantoms via Likert-scale questionnaire. RESULTS: The 3D printed neuraxial phantom cost $13 to print and required 25 hours of non-supervised printing and 2 hours of assembly time. The 3D printed phantom was found to be less realistic to surface palpation than the Simulab phantom due to fragility of the silicone but had significantly better fidelity for loss of resistance, dural puncture and ultrasound imaging than the Simulab phantom. CONCLUSION: Low-cost neuraxial phantoms with fidelity comparable to commercial models can be produced using CT data and low-cost infrastructure consisting of FLOS software and desktop 3D printers.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Imagens de Fantasmas / Medicina de Precisão / Impressão Tridimensional / Anestesia / Anestesiologia / Vértebras Lombares / Modelos Anatômicos Tipo de estudo: Health_economic_evaluation / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Imagens de Fantasmas / Medicina de Precisão / Impressão Tridimensional / Anestesia / Anestesiologia / Vértebras Lombares / Modelos Anatômicos Tipo de estudo: Health_economic_evaluation / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article