No. 238-Supracervical Hysterectomy.
J Obstet Gynaecol Can
; 40(7): e597-e604, 2018 07.
Article
em En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-29921438
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE:
This guideline reviews the evidence relating to the potential benefits of the vaginal hysterectomy (VH) and supracervical hysterectomy (SCH) versus total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH) with respect to postoperative sexual function, urinary function, and peri- and postoperative complications. Laparoscopic options are not included in this guideline. OPTIONS Women considering hysterectomy for benign disease can be given the option of retaining the cervix or proceeding with a total hysterectomy.OUTCOMES:
The outcomes measured are postoperative sexual function and urinary function, and peri- and postoperative complications. EVIDENCE The Cochrane Library, Medline, and Embase were searched for articles published in English from January 1950 to March 2008 specifically comparing VH and SCH with TAH in the prevention of sexual dysfunction, urinary dysfunction, and peri- and postoperative complications. Results were restricted to systematic reviews, randomized control trials/controlled clinical trials, and observational studies. Additional publications were identified from the bibliographies of these articles. Randomized controlled trials were considered evidence of the highest quality, followed by cohort studies. Grey (unpublished) literature was identified through searching the websites of health technology assessment and health technology assessment-related agencies, clinical practice guideline collections, clinical trial registries, and national and international medical specialty societies. VALUES The quality of evidence was rated using the criteria described in the Report of the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care (Table).Palavras-chave
Texto completo:
1
Base de dados:
MEDLINE
Assunto principal:
Colo do Útero
/
Histerectomia Vaginal
Tipo de estudo:
Clinical_trials
/
Guideline
/
Health_technology_assessment
/
Observational_studies
/
Prognostic_studies
/
Risk_factors_studies
/
Systematic_reviews
Limite:
Female
/
Humans
País como assunto:
America do norte
Idioma:
En
Ano de publicação:
2018
Tipo de documento:
Article