Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of Multifrequency Bioelectrical Impedance vs. Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry for Assessing Body Composition Changes After Participation in a 10-Week Resistance Training Program.
Schoenfeld, Brad J; Nickerson, Brett S; Wilborn, Colin D; Urbina, Stacie L; Hayward, Sara B; Krieger, James; Aragon, Alan A; Tinsley, Grant M.
Afiliação
  • Schoenfeld BJ; Department of Health Science, Lehman College, Bronx, New York.
  • Nickerson BS; Department of Professional Programs, Texas A&M International University, Laredo, Texas.
  • Wilborn CD; Exercise and Sport Science Department, University of Mary Hardin-Baylor, Belton, Texas.
  • Urbina SL; Exercise and Sport Science Department, University of Mary Hardin-Baylor, Belton, Texas.
  • Hayward SB; Exercise and Sport Science Department, University of Mary Hardin-Baylor, Belton, Texas.
  • Krieger J; Weightology, LLC, Issaquah, Washington.
  • Aragon AA; California State University, Northridge, California; and.
  • Tinsley GM; Department of Kinesiology and Sport Management, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas.
J Strength Cond Res ; 34(3): 678-688, 2020 Mar.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29927888
ABSTRACT
Schoenfeld, BJ, Nickerson, BS, Wilborn, CD, Urbina, SL, Hayward, SB, Krieger, J, Aragon, AA, and Tinsley, G. Comparison of multifrequency bioelectrical impedance vs. dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry for assessing body composition changes after participation in a 10-week resistance training program. J Strength Cond Res 34(3) 678-688, 2020-The purpose of this study was to assess the ability of multifrequency bioelectrical impedance analysis (MF-BIA) to determine alterations in total and segmental body composition across a 10-week resistance training (RT) program in comparison with the criterion reference dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Twenty-one young male volunteers (mean ± SD; age = 22.9 ± 3.0 years; height = 175.5 ± 5.9 cm; body mass = 82.9 ± 13.6 kg; body mass index = 26.9 ± 3.6) performed an RT program that included exercises for all major muscle groups. Body composition was assessed using both methods before and after the intervention; change scores were determined by subtracting pre-test values from post-test values for percent body fat ([INCREMENT]%BF), fat mass ([INCREMENT]FM), and fat-free mass ([INCREMENT]FFM). Mean changes were not significantly different when comparing MF-BIA with DXA for [INCREMENT]%BF (-1.05 vs. -1.28%), [INCREMENT]FM (-1.13 vs. -1.19 kg), and FFM (0.10 vs. 0.37 kg, respectively). Both methods showed strong agreement for [INCREMENT]%BF (r = 0.75; standard error of the estimate [SEE] = 1.15%), [INCREMENT]FM (r = 0.84; SEE 1.0 kg), and [INCREMENT]FFM (r = 0.71; SEE of 1.5 kg). The 2 methods were poor predictors of each other in regards to changes in segmental measurements. Our data indicate that MF-BIA is an acceptable alternative for tracking changes in FM and FFM during a combined diet and exercise program in young, athletic men, but segmental lean mass measurements must be interpreted with circumspection.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Composição Corporal / Absorciometria de Fóton / Impedância Elétrica / Treinamento Resistido Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Composição Corporal / Absorciometria de Fóton / Impedância Elétrica / Treinamento Resistido Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article