Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Modified Robert Jones bandage can not reduce invisible blood loss after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized-controlled trial.
Pornrattanamaneewong, Chaturong; Ruangsomboon, Pakpoom; Chareancholvanich, Keerati; Wilairatana, Vajara; Narkbunnam, Rapeepat.
Afiliação
  • Pornrattanamaneewong C; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
  • Ruangsomboon P; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
  • Chareancholvanich K; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
  • Wilairatana V; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
  • Narkbunnam R; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand. mai_parma@hotmail.com.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg ; 138(8): 1151-1157, 2018 Aug.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29931392
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

To compare the efficacy and safety of modified Robert Jones bandage (MRJB) and non-compressive dressing (NCD) on reducing invisible blood loss (IBL) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

Eighty patients who underwent unilateral TKA were randomly assigned into two groups MRJB and NCD groups. Pre- and post-operative hematocrit levels, amount of drained blood and transfused blood were measured and calculated into IBL. Pain score, amount of morphine usage, range of motion (ROM) at discharge, blood transfusion rate, and complications were also recorded and compared between both groups.

RESULTS:

There was no significant difference in the mean IBL between MRJB (221.2 ± 233.3 ml) and NCD groups (158.5 ± 186.7 ml) (p = 0.219). Post-operative pain score at rest and during ambulation, amount of morphine usage, ROM at discharge, blood transfusion rate, and complications were also similar between two groups.

CONCLUSIONS:

This study cannot determine the benefit of MRJB over NCD. The use of MRJB may not be necessary after primary TKA.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Bandagens / Técnicas Hemostáticas / Hemorragia Pós-Operatória / Artroplastia do Joelho Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Bandagens / Técnicas Hemostáticas / Hemorragia Pós-Operatória / Artroplastia do Joelho Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article