Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Isolated forearm technique: a meta-analysis of connected consciousness during different general anaesthesia regimens.
Linassi, F; Zanatta, P; Tellaroli, P; Ori, C; Carron, M.
Afiliação
  • Linassi F; Department of Medicine, Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, University of Padova, Padova, Italy. Electronic address: federico.linassi@studenti.unipd.it.
  • Zanatta P; Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Integrated University Hospital of Verona, Verona, Italy.
  • Tellaroli P; Department of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
  • Ori C; Department of Medicine, Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
  • Carron M; Department of Medicine, Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Br J Anaesth ; 121(1): 198-209, 2018 Jul.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29935574
BACKGROUND: General anaesthesia should prevent patients from experiencing surgery, defined as connected consciousness. The isolated forearm technique (IFT) is the current gold standard for connected consciousness monitoring. We evaluated the efficacy of different anaesthesia regimens in preventing IFT responses. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review with meta-analysis of studies evaluating IFT in adults. Proportions of IFT-positive patients were compared for inhalational versus intravenous anaesthesia and anaesthesia brain monitor (ABM)-guided versus non-ABM-guided. RESULTS: Of 1131 patients in 22 studies, 393 (34.8%) had an IFT response during induction or maintenance. IFT-positive patients were less frequent during induction (19.7% [95% CI, 17.5-22.1]) than during maintenance (31.2% [95% CI, 27.8-34.8]). Proportions of IFT-positive patients during induction and maintenance were similar for inhalational (0.51 [95% CI, 0.38-0.65]) and intravenous (0.52 [95% CI, 0.26-0.77]) anaesthesia, but during maintenance were lower with inhalational (0.18 [95% CI, 0.08-0.38]) than with intravenous (0.48 [95% CI, 0.24-0.73]) anaesthesia. Proportions of IFT-positive patients during induction and maintenance were not significantly different for ABM-guided (0.64 [95% CI, 0.39-0.83]) and non-ABM-guided (0.48 [95% CI, 0.34-0.62]) anaesthesia but during maintenance were lower with non-ABM-guided (0.19 [95% CI, 0.09-0.37]) than with ABM-guided (0.57 [95% CI, 0.34-0.77]). Proportions of IFT-positive patients decreased significantly with increasing age and premedication use. Of the 34 anaesthesia regimens, 16 were inadequate. Studies had low methodological quality (only seven randomised controlled trials) and significant heterogeneity. CONCLUSIONS: Standard general anaesthesia regimens might not prevent connected consciousness. More accurate anaesthesia brain monitor methodology to reduce the likelihood of connected consciousness is desirable.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Estado de Consciência / Antebraço / Anestesia Geral Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Estado de Consciência / Antebraço / Anestesia Geral Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article