Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Reducing cost and improving operating room efficiency: examination of surgical instrument processing.
Dyas, Adam R; Lovell, Kelly M; Balentine, Courtney J; Wang, Thomas N; Porterfield, John R; Chen, Herbert; Lindeman, Brenessa M.
Afiliação
  • Dyas AR; Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.
  • Lovell KM; Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.
  • Balentine CJ; Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.
  • Wang TN; Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.
  • Porterfield JR; Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.
  • Chen H; Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.
  • Lindeman BM; Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama. Electronic address: blindeman@uabmc.edu.
J Surg Res ; 229: 15-19, 2018 09.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29936982
BACKGROUND: Operating room efficiency can be compromised because of surgical instrument processing delays. We observed that many instruments in a standardized tray were not routinely used during thyroid and parathyroid surgery at our institution. Our objective was to create a streamlined instrument tray to optimize operative efficiency and cost. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Head and neck surgical instrument trays were evaluated by operating room team leaders. Instruments were identified as either necessary or unnecessary based on use during thyroidectomies and parathyroidectomies. The operating room preparation time, tray weights, number of trays, and number of instruments were recorded for the original and new surgical trays. Cost savings were calculated using estimated reprocessing cost of $0.51 per instrument. RESULTS: Three of 13 head and neck trays were converted to thyroidectomy and parathyroidectomy trays. The starting head and neck surgical set was reduced from two trays with 98 total instruments to one tray with 36 instruments. Tray weight decreased from 27 pounds to 10 pounds. Tray preparation time decreased from 8 min to 3 min. The new tray saved $31.62 ($49.98 to $18.36) per operation in reprocessing costs. Projected annual savings with hospitalwide implementation is over $28,000.00 for instrument processing alone. Unmeasured hospital savings include decreased instrument wear and replacement frequency, quicker operating room setup, and decreased decontamination costs. CONCLUSIONS: Optimizing surgical trays can reduce cost, physical strain, preparation time, decontamination time, and processing times, and streamlining trays is an effective strategy for hospitals to reduce costs and increase operating room efficiency.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Salas Cirúrgicas / Tireoidectomia / Paratireoidectomia / Gastos em Saúde / Utilização de Equipamentos e Suprimentos Tipo de estudo: Health_economic_evaluation / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Salas Cirúrgicas / Tireoidectomia / Paratireoidectomia / Gastos em Saúde / Utilização de Equipamentos e Suprimentos Tipo de estudo: Health_economic_evaluation / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article