Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Transplanting Hepatitis C Virus-Infected Versus Uninfected Kidneys Into Hepatitis C Virus-Infected Recipients: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.
Eckman, Mark H; Woodle, E Steve; Thakar, Charuhas V; Paterno, Flavio; Sherman, Kenneth E.
Afiliação
  • Eckman MH; University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio (M.H.E., E.S.W., C.V.T., F.P., K.E.S.).
  • Woodle ES; University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio (M.H.E., E.S.W., C.V.T., F.P., K.E.S.).
  • Thakar CV; University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio (M.H.E., E.S.W., C.V.T., F.P., K.E.S.).
  • Paterno F; University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio (M.H.E., E.S.W., C.V.T., F.P., K.E.S.).
  • Sherman KE; University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio (M.H.E., E.S.W., C.V.T., F.P., K.E.S.).
Ann Intern Med ; 169(4): 214-223, 2018 08 21.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29987322
ABSTRACT

Background:

Direct-acting antiviral agents are now available to treat chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD).

Objective:

To examine whether it is more cost-effective to transplant HCV-infected or HCV-uninfected kidneys into HCV-infected patients.

Design:

Markov state-transition decision model. Data Sources MEDLINE searches and bibliographies from relevant English-language articles. Target Population HCV-infected patients with ESRD receiving hemodialysis in the United States. Time Horizon Lifetime. Perspective Health care system. Intervention Transplant of an HCV-infected kidney followed by HCV treatment versus transplant of an HCV-uninfected kidney preceded by HCV treatment. Outcome

Measures:

Effectiveness, measured in quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and costs, measured in 2017 U.S. dollars. Results of Base-Case

Analysis:

Transplant of an HCV-infected kidney followed by HCV treatment was more effective and less costly than transplant of an HCV-uninfected kidney preceded by HCV treatment, largely because of longer wait times for uninfected kidneys. A typical 57.8-year-old patient receiving hemodialysis would gain an average of 0.50 QALY at a lifetime cost savings of $41 591. Results of Sensitivity

Analysis:

Transplant of an HCV-infected kidney followed by HCV treatment continued to be preferred in sensitivity analyses of many model parameters. Transplant of an HCV-uninfected kidney preceded by HCV treatment was not preferred unless the additional wait time for an uninfected kidney was less than 161 days.

Limitation:

The study did not consider the benefit of decreased HCV transmission from treating HCV-infected patients.

Conclusion:

Transplanting HCV-infected kidneys into HCV-infected patients increased quality-adjusted life expectancy and reduced costs compared with transplanting HCV-uninfected kidneys into HCV-infected patients. Primary Funding Source Merck Sharp & Dohme and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Antivirais / Doadores de Tecidos / Transplante de Rim / Análise Custo-Benefício / Hepatite C Crônica / Falência Renal Crônica Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Health_economic_evaluation / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Antivirais / Doadores de Tecidos / Transplante de Rim / Análise Custo-Benefício / Hepatite C Crônica / Falência Renal Crônica Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Health_economic_evaluation / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article