Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Clinical Outcomes of Repeat Aortic Valve Replacement for Subaortic Pannus in Mechanical Aortic Valve.
Park, Pyo Won; Park, Byungjoon; Jeong, Dong Seop; Sung, Kiick; Kim, Wook Sung; Lee, Young Tak; Park, Seung Woo.
Afiliação
  • Park PW; Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine.
  • Park B; Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine.
  • Jeong DS; Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine.
  • Sung K; Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine.
  • Kim WS; Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine.
  • Lee YT; Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine.
  • Park SW; Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine.
Circ J ; 82(10): 2535-2541, 2018 09 25.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30068855
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

This study aimed to evaluate the early and late clinical outcomes after repeat aortic valve replacement (AVR) for subaortic pannus in patients with mechanical valves. Methods and 

Results:

Between 2001 and 2017, 51 patients (median age, 59 years; 42 women) with prosthetic aortic stenosis (AS) caused by pannus ingrowth underwent repeat AVR because of acute malfunction of monoleaflet valve (3 patients), severe prosthetic AS (30 patients), and moderate prosthetic AS at the time of tricuspid or mitral valve surgery (18 patients). The median follow-up duration was 100 (interquartile range, 64-138) months. Double valve replacement was performed in 45 (88%) patients. Median time interval from previous operation was 161 (interquartile range, 121-194) months. The explanted mechanical AV was monoleaflet and bileaflet in 16 (31%) and 34 (67%) patients, respectively. Concomitant procedures included 16 mitral valve replacements (14 repeat) and 36 tricuspid valve surgeries (15 replacements, 21 repairs). No hospital deaths or cases of heart block occurred. Overall survival and event-free survival rates at 10 years were 88% and 51%, respectively. Late complications included recurrent prosthetic AS (4 patients), new paravalvular leakage of the mitral valve (5 patients), and severe tricuspid regurgitation (2 patients).

CONCLUSIONS:

Although repeat AVR for subaortic pannus had acceptable early and late survival, recurrent prosthetic AS was frequently observed during late follow-up.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Valva Aórtica / Reoperação / Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Valva Aórtica / Reoperação / Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article